• 04/28/2014
    9:30 AM
  • Rating: 
    0 votes
    Vote up!
    Vote down!

Exploring Amazon's Mayday: Visual Customer Service Options

The Mayday button on Amazon's Kindle opens doors for new approaches to visual customer service, but the benefits, risks, and costs must be considered.

Visual sharing is a natural way for people to communicate. Amazon's launch of the Mayday button on its new Kindle has brought a great deal of attention to how visual sharing can be applied to customer service interactions and unified communications platforms. Many experts have hailed Mayday as the future of customer service, raising the bar for all other businesses.

For companies looking to replicate features similar to Amazon's Mayday, it's important to understand the different ways a visual customer service experience can be achieved, along with the risks and benefits of each.

Option 1: Video interaction between customer and agent
This is a two-way video sharing experience. It closely mirrors an in-person experience, as both parties are viewing each other and conversing "face to face."

Pros: Video serves as a very personal way of communicating, well suited for a smaller company or a business group serving a specific customer segment. Because the agent's view is of the customer and not of the customer's computer or mobile screen, the risks of data and information security are low.

Cons: The privacy and security concerns inherent in this approach are many and are quite serious. Opening up a video channel between online customers and contact center agents requires a great deal of thought concerning procedures and safety, as well as technology, staffing, training, and infrastructure. It is also arguable that, in this scenario, relying solely on video without any screen-sharing or co-browsing component (Option 3) will provide little value in terms of efficiently resolving a question or issue.

Option 2: Video feed shows the agent to a customer
In this approach, a customer sees a video feed of the agent assisting him, but the agent cannot see the customer.

Pros: The procedure and safety concerns of Option 1 are limited to only the agent side in this scenario, making it slightly more attainable. The experience of seeing the customer service agent speaking and listening may have a positive effect, with customers feeling understood and confident that the company cares about their issues.

Cons: The agent-via-video approach still requires significant investment in technology infrastructure and procedural changes. In many cases, the act of video chatting may in fact end up distracting the customer and agent from reaching a resolution, slowing down call times instead of making the interaction more efficient.

Some consumers are quite keen to experiment with the Mayday video feature, with its instant gratification and potential for amusement. Without building in a screen sharing or co-browsing component similar to Mayday, the video-only interaction will not enable efficient resolution to questions or problems.

Option 3: Customer and agent view the same data/materials
In this scenario, there is no video feed or interaction, but rather the customer and agent are co-browsing, placing the purpose of the interaction front-and-center and putting the agent and customer on the same page -- literally.

Amazon utilizes this approach simultaneously with its agent-via-video feed to allow the agent to see and control the customer's Kindle screen while conversing on audio and video.

Pros: The attention of both the agent and the customer is on the issue at hand. There is nothing distracting from the process of resolving the issue, whether that is by showing the customer where to click to find or do something, walking through a form or application together, selecting a product, or troubleshooting an issue. Because co-browsing is a SaaS solution, there is no technology investment and minimal agent required, and it brings up none of the significant staffing and environmental concerns of Options 1 or 2.

Cons: Security and customer privacy concerns abound when considering the ability to see a customer's computer or mobile device screen during a customer service interaction. This concern can be addressed with data masking capabilities, enabling companies to block anything from an agent's view that is not necessary to see in order to reach a call resolution.

For example, some companies may allow agents to see only the corporate website, a handful of third-party partner or government websites, and the customer's PDF reader in order to walk through documents together. This can be further drilled down to block specific pages from the websites chosen, and can even include blocking fields on an individual web form, such as credit card numbers.

Amazon's Mayday feature is quite innovative, and the customer service technology industry will certainly be watching to see how consumers will receive instant video and screen sharing experiences. As companies consider how this advancement will influence their own customer service strategies, I suspect that we'll see rapid adoption high-value, low-risk customer service tools.


Visual Customer Service

I'm surprised I don't encounter the availability of these services more frequently. They seem like the benefits would far outweigh the costs for many businesses, but they are slow to catch on. What businesses besides Amazon use visual customer service?

Re: Visual Customer Service

These kind of services seem rare, but Option #3 could have a lot of potential to speed up troubleshooting. Trying to explain problems over the phone can be difficult and time consuming.

Re: Visual Customer Service

I guess Customer Service has changed a lot in last few years from just phone to chat, click-to-call, co-browsing, social tools. Video chatting has a strong value, on the other hand Visual sharing is also growing as you dont require investment to support video chatting.

Re: Visual Customer Service

Thanks for your comment! I agree, there has been a great deal of changes to customer service technology over the past few years, and it will be interesting to see how adoption of video chatting goes over the next few years.

Re: Visual Customer Service

In terms of adoptation we could see good numbers, but with same i would like share my experiance with referance to Skype, when i use this application on my phone i feel irritated and frustated and that due bad internet speed or connectivity but when i use on laptop with office LAN connected service works perfectly fine. My purpose to share this is that it depends lot on speed and service you get.

Re: Visual Customer Service

Aditya, you're right about that. If performance is an issue, then simplicity is often a better way to go. Limited bandwidth would certainly affect any customer service applications using video. I'm not so certain about screen-sharing or co-browsing, however. Perhaps Igor can illuminate us.

It's a good reminder that businesses always need to have multiple platforms for customer contact.

Re: Visual Customer Service

Hi Susan and Aditya - very good point about bandwidth. These technologies are created to be very light weight and we don't typically see any degradation in performance due to internet speeds. The only issue might be in the case of a dial-up connection, which we don't see often today.

Re: Visual Customer Service

Great to know the technologies are lightweight. Thanks for the details, Igor!

Re: Visual Customer Service

Thanks MarciaNWC, yes, the experience is better for both the customer and the agent when there is no need to explain things verbally. I think that options 1-2 will continue to be rare services for the time being, but option 3 is becoming more common today for the exact reason you stated.

Re: Visual Customer Service

Thanks for your comment Susan! Many companies today do use visual customer service, but where adoption is slower is for companies looking at using options 1 or 2 to make it happen. Video is still very new, and aside from Amazon there are just a handful of companies I know of who are doing this (American Express is one). But for option 3, visual collaboration without the video component, this is very common today. Hundreds of banks, insurance companies, retailers and technology brands use co-browsing for visual customer service with great results.

Re: Visual Customer Service

Hi Igor, thanks for your response! I guess I am just not running into the rigth customer service departments online :(. I have definitely had some bad text chat experiences, so I'm looking forward to the improvements of cobrowsing and visual technologies.

Re: Visual Customer Service

I also look forward to these  improved types of customer services. I've also had some very poor text chat experiences -- particularly with a major service provider. Complete waste of time.