Network Computing is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

High on Fibre: Page 9 of 16

We tested three midrange Fibre Channel switches--2-GB units with 16 to 24 ports, selling for $25,000 or less: Brocade's SilkWorm 3800, McData's Sphereon 4500 and QLogic's SANbox2. Our tests taxed these devices by operating in full-mesh mode (every port connected to every other port), and by measuring performance under loads ranging from 25 percent to 100 percent, with sizes ranging from 60 to 2,048 frames. Although the machines all performed respectably or better, QLogic stood out with its combination of excellent throughput, reasonable latency, great features and a good price.

We tested midrange Fibre Channel switches' throughput and latency, under varying loads (25 percent, 50 percent, 75 percent and 100 percent) and three different frame sizes (60-frame, 1,076-frame and 2,148-frame messages). Our test bed included a Spirent Communications SmartBits 6000B, and SmartBits 600 with SmartFabric software and Spirent's 2-gigabit dual-port Fibre Channel test cards. The SmartBits units were connected directly to the switches under test. We collected test results on a Dell Precision Workstation 410 with 512 MB of RAM and Microsoft Windows Server 2000.

We performed two full-mesh tests--that is, tests in which every port was connected to every other port. The full-mesh throughput test is a killer challenge that measures throughput, high-end latency, frame loss, latency distribution, and gives a latency snapshot. The throughput and frame-loss tests are most important. None of the switches we tested dropped a single frame under any circumstances.

The full-mesh latency test works the same as the full-mesh throughput test, but measures latency. However, because this test really measures buffer latency, the Brocade SilkWorm's extra buffering credits sharply skewed the unit's test results. The Brocade results show that we are clearly measuring frames in the buffer, as the frames have aged in the buffer.

In our port-to-port latency test, we sent 50 frames from one port to another, in pairs only. This tests basic switch latency without any significant load on the switch. Port 0 sends 50 frames to Port 1 and average latency of those frames is measured.

Finally, we created a new test, to measure latency under load and to try to verify Brocade's claims of improved switch performance. We used our SmartBits 600 to measure the port-to-port latency from Port 0 to Port 4 and from Port 8 to Port 12, while our SmartBits 6000B ran a full-mesh test on all the other ports. The result is an uncongested latency measurement while the switch is under load. This is what latency will look like on uncongested links while other links are loaded.