Network Computing is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Report: Users Mull IP

Many buyers of networked storage see an evolution to IP equipment as inevitable, but they continue to take a wait-and-see approach to the iSCSI-versus-Fibre Channel race.

In "Byte and Switch Storage User Survey," the latest report from the Byte and Switch Insider, this publication's paid subscription research service, 45 percent of respondents said they think Ethernet/iSCSI will ultimately replace Fibre Channel as the primary storage networking interconnection. Only 23 percent expect Fibre Channel to eventually win out, while 28 percent are unsure of the end result.

In their comments, respondents seemed ambivalent: I regard IP as unstoppable – in the fullness of time,” one respondent said. A more cautious reader warned, “Fibre Channel still has some advantages, and funny things happen on the way to market supremacy.”

Some remain skeptical of claims for greater storage efficiencies through iSCSI and IP in general. "FC is more mature," wrote one respondent. "Also, for larger enterprises, the expertise in managing networks and storage are in widely different departments, so iSCSI's promise of using existing human resources does not bear out."

Still, the siren song of IP is tough to ignore. Several respondents commented that Ethernet is more pervasive and easily upgraded than FC, and there are concerns about the state of the FC standards. "While I think that FC will still occupy a segment of the market, I see Ethernet/iSCSI becoming more of the standard," one wrote. "With a clear migration path to 10-Gbit/s speeds, iSCSI has the simplest upgrade path. FC has the advantage of less latency, but I believe FC's unclear roadmap will split the FC market and cause prices to continue to be much higher than the iSCSI alternatives."

  • 1