Troubleshooting Port Channels On Cisco Nexus 5500 Switches

Carole Warner Reece explains how she resolved a vPC port channel problem involving Nexus 5500 switches and NetApp controllers.

Carole Warner Reece

November 23, 2016

3 Min Read
NetworkComputing logo in a gray background | NetworkComputing

I was recently troubleshooting a vPC port channel issue with a pair of Nexus 5500 switches that were trying to implement new port channels to two NetApp controllers.

null

1-troubleshooting_vPC.png

I got involved when my storage friend sent me an email one evening asking me to check the port channel for one interface that was not wanting to participate in the port channel from the NetApp perspective. As it turned out, I was not initially able to contact him for more details because we were working different shifts.

I checked on the N5Ks, and I saw that one port channel was down on ST-5K1, but all of the other port channels were up.

null

2--768x107.png

null

3-768x126.png

 

I checked the physical interface status for the port channel, and the interface for the down port channel appeared not to be connected.

The vPC results showed that the ST-5Ks thought two different devices were connected to their respective e1/32 interfaces:

null

4.png

 

I checked the recent log messages for the interface. Maybe someone had pulled out the SFP?

null

5-1.png

null

6.png

 

null

7 (1).png

null

8.png

 

Hmm — both 5Ks had complained about a hot standby state at the same time. I usually find this means the cables have been cross connected so the vPC port channel from the Nexus switch pair is connected to two different devices, which is not a supported state.

I was also wondering why the ST-5K1 17:25:45 log entry said the hardware type changed to No-Transceiver. This seemed off — I thought all the cables had been placed earlier. My guess was that no one had removed the SFP, and that maybe NX-OS was confused about the current state of the cables.

To see if I could clear out the ‘vpc port channel mis-config,’ I bounced the port channel interface.

null

9 (1).png

 

I checked, and the vPC was still listed as misconfigured.

null

10.png

 

In addition, the physical interface had a new weird state:

null

11 (1).png

 

I do not recall ever seeing a physical interface down due to adminCfgChange as the reason. But I interpreted the state to mean the NX-OS was confused about the interface state based on the configuration changes, so I also shut/no shut the physical interface e1/32.

null

12-NetCraftsmen-Code-Image.png

 

There were a lot of messages over the next 30 seconds or so. After all the initialization, both the interface and the port channel came up.

null

13-Screen-Shot-2016-11-17-at-10.44.41-AM.png

 

I sent a note to the storage team and they did confirm the port channels were now appearing correctly. 

Summary

My guess was the NX-OS on ST-5K1 was confused about the vPC port channel configuration due to cables that were incorrectly connected to two devices, then hot-swapped to the correct orientation. ST-5K1 appears to have needed the physical interface to be reset for the incorrect vPC port channel configuration to get cleared out. Possibly based on the timing or order of the cable swaps, ST-5K2 recovered on its own.

This article originally appeared on the Netcraftsmen blog.

 

About the Author

Carole Warner Reece

Architect, NetscraftsmenA senior network consultant with more than 15 years of industry experience, Carole is one of Netcraftsmen's most highly experienced network professionals. Her current focus is on the data center and network infrastructure.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
Stay informed! Sign up to get expert advice and insight delivered direct to your inbox

You May Also Like


More Insights