VeriSign Vs. ICANN
It's VeriSign's wait-list service Vs. ICANN's authority over the Internet domain name system.
March 12, 2004
![Network Computing logo Network Computing logo](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltde8121fc52c5c8f3/blt3f3d0318f746b1c2/65a530e4187606040a1d8b8c/placeholder.png?width=1280&auto=webp&quality=95&format=jpg&disable=upscale)
Under the WLS system, a .com name can be ordered from VeriSign. If the name is in use, it is back-ordered. When it's available, it's sold to the highest bidder. VeriSign says retailers and other speculators put a strain on the master registry by constantly requesting names to determine their availability. WLS would let applicants obtain back-ordered domain names on a first-come, first-served basis. But retailers complain that domain-name applicants would have to pay an annual fee to maintain their position in the wait list without knowing if the requested name will become available. In effect, the WLS threatens a business grown around an arcane way of administrating names.
Whether VeriSign has the authority to implement WLS will come down to the court's interpretation of the contracts between Commerce, ICANN and VeriSign. If Commerce does not like the court's interpretation, it could modify the contracts when they come up for renewal. Either way, a caretaker of TLDs should care more about the open process for name-dropping and less about a steady income.
You May Also Like
Maximizing cloud potential: Building and operating an effective Cloud Center of Excellence (CCoE)
September 10, 2024Radical Automation of ITSM
September 19, 2024Maximizing Manufacturing Efficiency with Real-Time Production Monitoring
September 25, 2024