Is The Internet The Model For 'Everynet?'

Perhaps it's time to set aside the Internet model and instead look to a model of networking based on SDN and NFV.

Tom Nolle

May 27, 2015

2 Min Read
Network Computing logo

Mobility already has driven profound changes in how we use the Internet, and it's in the process of driving changes in how enterprises empower workers. If we add in things like the personal digital assistants -- Siri and Cortana, for example -- and the Internet of Things (IoT), it's hard to see more than a shadow of the "old" days of browsing and searching for content. If things are really changing that much, does that mean the model of networking itself has to change? Are things like software-defined networking (SDN) and network functions virtualization (NFV) going to make today's networking and the Internet "better" or are they going to end up replacing them with something else?

The Internet was a success in no small part because it became what many called "data dial tone," a fabric of connectivity that let any user access any resource. This connectivity has been essential to the World Wide Web and to evolving content and social-media applications. It's also been the source of hacking, denial-of-service, security and compliance headaches; address space problems; and declining operator profit per bit.

We can build the new contextual services, personal agency, and all of what I've called "information populism" on the Internet model, and hope that the benefits of open connectivity aren't overrun by the problems and risks. Or we could try something else. That might sound farfetched given how mature IP and the Internet are, but SDN and NFV do in fact open a new model and this is the time to ask how far the new model could take us.

Think outside the tunnel

We already know that NFV can build service features by deploying components onto what effectively are private subnetworks created via SDN. Think of an NFV deployment as a set of features inside a residential LAN -- you can create a gateway in and out but what's inside isn't accessible from the outside. That's essential if we're to keep hackers from attacking pieces of a critical service. It's also useful in building applications.

Imagine a data center with SDN/NFV-based applications, each on its own little private VPN. Now imagine branch offices from which users get tunnels to the application-specific networks they need. They get only what they're allowed to have, and the applications and their data are not accessible except through those little controlled tunnels. A lot of security is now intrinsic.

Read the rest of the article on No Jitter.

About the Author(s)

Tom Nolle

President & Founder, CIMI Corporation

Tom is a software engineer and architect with more than 30 years experience in telecommunications and network technology. He has been an independent consultant specializing in telecom, datacomm, media, technology, market forecasting, and regulatory policy analysis since 1979, and CEO of CIMI Corporation since 1982. Tom writes regularly for No Jitter and multiple TechTarget publications, and publishes his own public blog dedicated to telecom, media, and technology strategy professionals. He also creates a series of reports on technology, market, and economic conditions. Most recently, Tom launched CloudNFV, a multi-vendor initiative the ETSI standard for Network Functions Virtualization using principles of cloud computing and the Telemanagement Forum's GB922 Services domain, which grew to become the ExperiaSphere open source management and orchestration project.

Stay informed! Sign up to get expert advice and insight delivered direct to your inbox

You May Also Like

More Insights