Buggin' Out?

Simmering debate over the month-of-bugs approach boils over among researchers

January 2, 2007

1 Min Read
NetworkComputing logo in a gray background | NetworkComputing

4:35 PM -- There's something about the latest string of Month-of-Bugs initiatives -- the Month of Kernel Bugs (MOKB), the (almost)-Week of Oracle Bugs, and now the Month of Apple Bugs -- that's starting to eat at some researchers: whether this method of disclosing vulnerabilities and releasing exploits actually helps, or hurts, security. (See Apple Bug Bites OS X, Windows, An Apple (Bug) a Day, and Hackers and Humbugs.)

This, of course, is a no-brainer for vendors, which regularly preach responsible disclosure and chastise hackers who go public with bugs and exploits before they get a chance to patch the problems. Microsoft has made its feelings well known on this.

But although the research community rallied around the Month of Browser Bugs (MOBB) last July as a much-needed wakeup call for browser security, there's a growing debate among researchers as to whether this approach has run its course or not. Does this signal a rift in the researcher community?

We'll dive into this red-hot debate tomorrow, January 3. Check back with us then to get the latest details.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
Stay informed! Sign up to get expert advice and insight delivered direct to your inbox

You May Also Like


More Insights