HP: Not All Quiet On The Western Storage Front
Do not confuse being quiet with being inactive. With a few exceptions, HP has been generally quiet to industry analysts on what it is doing and where it is headed, since the CEO transition from Mark Hurd to Leo Apotheker occurred last year. But at least in the storage arena, the company is becoming more public as indicated by a recent teleconference for analysts on its HP StoreOnce deduplication software.
June 7, 2011
Do not confuse being quiet with being inactive. With a few exceptions, HP has been generally quiet to industry analysts on what it is doing and where it is headed, since the CEO transition from Mark Hurd to Leo Apotheker occurred last year. But at least in the storage arena, the company is becoming more public as indicated by a recent teleconference for analysts on its HP StoreOnce deduplication software.
Now, StoreOnce has actually been generally available to customers for some time, but HP wanted to make sure that analysts were fully aware of the product and its capabilities. Although this seems like getting the cart before the horse, it is understandable during a senior management transition. New executives need time to rethink the company’s existing strategic initiatives.
This can effect which products are emphasized and de-emphasized, and whether market messaging and positioning can be accelerated, more or less put on hold or slowed down. The same is not likely to happen to new product design and development or to the production of existing products or delivery of existing services. These processes are operational and tactical in nature, and continue as vendors want to continue bringing in revenues even though the overall strategic focus is under review.
From a more specific storage perspective, data deduplication is a hot topic in the disk to disk (D2D) backup market, so it was mandatory for HP to keep pace. Enter StoreOnce, a data deduplication product developed by HP Labs, the company’s research and development organization. StoreOnce is a software solution that runs on any of HP’s StorageWorks D2D backup systems. The D2D product family ranges from the smallest D2D2500, which supports between 1.5 and 3 TB of useable capacity, to the D2D4324, which scales from 24 to 72 TB.
This flexibility enables the use of D2D for a wide range of business and IT requirements. Customers have a choice of configuring the D2D appliance to backup applications in one of three ways. One is as a VTL (Virtual Tape Library), in which the D2D system presents itself as if it were a physical tape library to the backup application (a key HP differentiator here is the ability to support VTL over iSCSI). The second is as a NAS (network-attached storage) disk array, which presents itself as NAS file-based disk storage using the CIFS and/or NFS protocols that are standard for NAS to the backup applications. The third option is Symantec’s OpenStorage interface, which is an API supported by Symantec’s backup applications that enables high performance disk-based backup and recovery, catalogue consistent replication and a variety of other features.Conceptually, deduplication is very simple. The system’s task is to remove duplicate data, such as from a current stream of backup data, as compared to not only the stream itself, but what already exists in the backup disk repository, where all previous backups are held. The goal is to keep one copy of each unique piece of data. The benefits are two-fold: 1) to reduce the amount of capacity that is needed to store data, and 2) to reduce the amount of data that has to be sent over a network when implementing an automated disaster recovery strategy. With disk-based backup systems gaining popularity as the first line of backup-restore defense, deduplication is considered more and more essential for any D2D package.
Although pioneers in any new technology have a first-mover advantage, later entrants into the space are by no means locked out. The reason is that later entrants are able to take a fresh look at the problem that needs to be solved and the limitations of the initial solutions, and are thus able to avoid, at least in theory, the mistakes of earlier entrants. HP Labs feels that it has taken advantage of the extra time to come up with three important innovations
Automated, intelligent block size optimization — HP uses a “variable chunk” size approach; chunks being blocks of data that have to be managed during the deduplication process; StoreOnce leverages what HP calls a TTTD (two threshold, two divisor) algorithm to reduce the average chunk size and variability between chunks; the advantage is greater deduplication efficiency .
Sparse indexing — An index helps to keep track of all the places where a chunk has been used; each time a new chunk is read, a check has to be made to see if the chunk already exists; the less that the deduplication software has to read in doing this, the more efficient the system performs; HP Labs has developed what it calls a sparse index that matches the new data to old data in a fraction of the time of other similar technologies.
Smart data and index layout —Traditionally, data becomes fragmented as it is deduplicated, and that leads to very slow read/recover times; HP's data/index matching scheme keeps more chunks local, which helps reduce fragmentation.
All in all, HP StoreOnce seems to deliver a full, robust data deduplication software solution.
Knowing other deduplication vendors, I am sure that their respective competitive analysis groups have examined HP’s claims for StoreOnce inside and out and have positioned their products accordingly. The comparative advantages and disadvantages of other products is not the point, however. The point is that HP appears to have a competitive product with StoreOnce and that means that it is in the hunt for D2D sales with a product which can state the company’s case for customers.
It is a good sign for HP to be a little more proactive even while it waits for the “i’s to be dotted and the t’s to be crossed” on its broader strategic initiatives, which can then be translated into targeted competitive positioning. In addition, it is good to see HP Labs sparking what will likely be a commercially viable enterprise solution. Life has to go on and that means putting revenue bread on the table today as well as preparing tomorrow’s menu.
At the time of publication, HP is not a current customer of David Hill and the Mesabi Group.
About the Author
You May Also Like