Network Computing is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Report: Sonet's Tops for SAN Extension

IP continues to take a back seat to Sonet/SDH as a SAN extension method, mainly because it's not ready for synchronous mirroring, according to "SAN Extension: A Market in the Making," the latest report from Byte and Switch Insider, this publication's paid subscription research service.

IP isn't yet ready for fast data recovery. Instead, IP-based solutions are gaining traction in applications such as archiving data remotely on tape, for which no specific link is required between the data protected and backup copies, as is the case for data mirroring.

Other methods offer more reliability for data mirroring, though these also have pros and cons. Wave-division multiplexing (WDM), for instance, is currently the fastest and best-performing SAN extension method. But equipment is expensive and dark fiber, typically required for implementation, isn't always readily available.

Sonet/SDH, despite being the most widespread method, is operationally a hassle and expensive to scale. On the plus side, it offers robust management and quality of service. SAN extension also is evolving through Sonet/SDH improvements such as Generic Framing Procedure (GFP).

Not everyone agrees with the report's assessment of SAN extension methods. For example, Jim Morin, vice president of strategic planning for CNT (Nasdaq: CMNT), says that more than half the SAN extension products his company has shipped since 2002 had IP connectivity, compared to about 25 percent with Sonet, 15 percent with DWDM, and 10 percent with links to T1/T3 leased lines.

  • 1