How The Scot Sued The Spammer and Scored

Spammers should steer clear of Gordon Dick's inbox. This Scot won't take the law into his own hands, but he will take you to court.

March 13, 2007

1 Min Read
NetworkComputing logo in a gray background | NetworkComputing

There's a Scottish saying, "They that dance must pay the fiddler." Now it seems there should be another: "They that spam must pay the Scot". Fed up with the daily deluge of spam he received, Gordon Dick of Edinburgh, Scotland, decided to sue one of his inbox invaders--and won.

Gordon took Transcom Internet Services to court, arguing that the company had obtained his e-mail address illegally and without his consent. Transcom refuted the claim, saying that Gordon's e-mail address--along with over 40,000 others--was accidentally added to their databases. In the end, the small claims court agreed with Gordon, and awarded him £750 ($1,451) in damages and £619 ($1,198) in court costs.

Gordon's reason for taking the spammer to court was pretty self-explanatory. "When I contacted them they told me to sue them, so I did," he explained.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
Stay informed! Sign up to get expert advice and insight delivered direct to your inbox

You May Also Like


More Insights