Unified Communications

08:00 AM
Eric Krapf
Eric Krapf
Commentary
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

The Role Of Presence In UC

What makes Unified Communications unique, something other than just a bunch of applications running on an IP infrastructure? How does UC fundamentally change the communications architecture? There's a growing consensus that the answer is: Presence.

What makes Unified Communications unique, something other than just a bunch of applications running on an IP infrastructure? How does UC fundamentally change the communications architecture? There's a growing consensus that the answer is: Presence.Conceptually, presence is something that you almost certainly have now, assuming you use instant messaging. It starts out as nothing more than the "Status" line of your IM buddy list. But in the UC vision, it takes center stage.

While I was on vacation last week, several of our No Jitter bloggers were busy explaining the role that presence plays in UC (see Zeus Kerravala and Irwin Lazar). Among other points, Zeus notes that UC and presence don't necessarily require ubiquitous VoIP deployment, and he points out that presence could someday extend beyond individuals and their communications devices; potentially, any device that can be communications-enabled, such as a computerized production line device, could be presence-enabled for status tracking.

In his piece, Irwin notes the critical role that organizational challenges will play in getting presence deployed in the enterprise. Since presence is the foundation for integrating business apps, communications apps, and the underlying network, the IT staff responsible for all these elements must cooperate closely to achieve the integration.

Another enormous challenge to presence-enablement is a fundamental UC challenge that I discussed early in the life of this blog: Interoperability. Obviously, the more endpoints you can presence-enable, the more valuable presence becomes; it's a basic network effect at work. But at the same time, the more endpoints you're seeking to presence-enable, the more likely it is that they rely on different vendors, whose systems very likely do not implement the critical standards in an interoperable manner (Irwin touches on the importance of standards in his NJ post as well.) Furthermore, the process of linking different vendors' presence systems, if you are in a multivendor environment, has some inherent challenges that the vendors will have a difficult time overcoming even if they're inclined to try to do so. I wrote a feature on No Jitter that gets into some of the gory details.

So presence is a big step forward conceptually, as it helps us get a clear idea of what Unified Communications is, holistically. The bad news is, actually implementing presence in a true UC architecture is going to be a major challenge.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Cartoon
Slideshows
Audio Interviews
Archived Audio Interviews
Jeremy Schulman, founder of Schprockits, a network automation startup operating in stealth mode, joins us to explore whether networking professionals all need to learn programming in order to remain employed.
White Papers
Register for Network Computing Newsletters
Current Issue
2014 State of Unified Communications
2014 State of Unified Communications
If you thought consumerization killed UC, think again: 70% of our 488 respondents have or plan to put systems in place. Of those, 34% will roll UC out to 76% or more of their user base. And there’s some good news for UCaaS providers.
Video
Twitter Feed