Howard Marks

Network Computing Blogger


Upcoming Events

Where the Cloud Touches Down: Simplifying Data Center Infrastructure Management

Thursday, July 25, 2013
10:00 AM PT/1:00 PM ET

In most data centers, DCIM rests on a shaky foundation of manual record keeping and scattered documentation. OpManager replaces data center documentation with a single repository for data, QRCodes for asset tracking, accurate 3D mapping of asset locations, and a configuration management database (CMDB). In this webcast, sponsored by ManageEngine, you will see how a real-world datacenter mapping stored in racktables gets imported into OpManager, which then provides a 3D visualization of where assets actually are. You'll also see how the QR Code generator helps you make the link between real assets and the monitoring world, and how the layered CMDB provides a single point of view for all your configuration data.

Register Now!

A Network Computing Webinar:
SDN First Steps

Thursday, August 8, 2013
11:00 AM PT / 2:00 PM ET

This webinar will help attendees understand the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging. It will also help users decide whether SDN makes sense in their environment, and outline the first steps IT can take for testing SDN technologies.

Register Now!

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up

See more from this blogger

SSD Vendor OCZ Files For Bankruptcy

After a very rocky year, one-time high flying SSD maker OCZ announced last week that it's declaring bankruptcy. Flash foundry owner Toshiba has agreed to buy OCZ’s assets out of bankruptcy and provide debtor-in-possession financing to allow OCZ to continue operations through the proceedings.

The proximate cause of the bankruptcy was OCZ’s lender Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. ceasing whatever little cash was in OCZ’s bank accounts. The full story, of course, is more complicated and more interesting. The short version is that OCZ had been losing more than $100 million a year for the past couple of years and had just $70 million in total assets left.

Rumors about an OCZ takeover of some sort have floated around for well over a year. Last September, there were reports that Seagate was inches from buying the SSD vendor until OCZ founder and former CEO Ryan Petersen demanded a seat on the Seagate board as part of the price. Ryan left the company soon thereafter amid revenue shortfalls he blamed on NAND flash shortages.

As if a failed merger and founder/CEO jumping ship weren't bad enough, the bean counters at OCZ discovered problems with their SEC filings shortly after Ryan’s departure and replacement with Ralph Schmitt. OCZ had to restate earnings, and like every other company that’s been in this position, earnings were restated downward. It failed to file for a year, finally catching up in October of this year.

A lack of financial transparency led the banks to pull OCZ’s credit lines, and the company was forced into the expensive financing arrangement with Hercules that ultimately resulted in the hammer coming down.

One big problem was that the financial shenanigans caused the flash foundries to pull back on their sales of flash wafers to OCZ, which did its own packaging though it didn’t have a foundry of its own. Without flash to build into SSDs OCZ couldn’t sell its way out of the crisis.

The other problem is that OCZ, despite developing its own controller technology after buying Indilinx in 2011, has had a reputation for poor quality control. Take a quick glance at the comments on any article related to OCZ at enthusiast sites like Anandtech, Tom's Hardware or Ars Technica and you'll see many complaints about failed SSDs.

Clearly, OCZ’s collapse is another step in the inevitable shakeout of the SSD business. Not only were too many assemblers competing with too products that had no real differentiation, but there is a real NAND flash shortage building. All of that boosts the advantage of the flash foundry vendors (Intel/Micron, Samsung, Toshiba/SanDisk and SK Hynix). Players such as Micron and Samsung have already shown that they’d rather sell higher margin SSDs directly to consumers and OEMs than raw flash wafers to folks like OCZ.

[As the SSD market consolidates, what companies will survive? Read Howard Marks' analysis in "SSD Vendors: Who Will Win?"]

While Toshiba makes some SSDs -- unlike SK Hynix, which is to date still is only a component provider and has its own problems recovering from a DRAM factory fire in China -- it's a minor player in the market. An OCZ/Toshiba branding could leverage OCZ’s brand recognition while also playing off the Japanese reputation for quality, moving Toshiba into a leading position in the SSD market.

It might even open enterprise doors that have been closed to OCZ’s caching products because users were turned off by OCZ's reputation and avoided them. All in all, the deal is probably worth the $35 million Toshiba is offering.

The big question now is how will stand-alone SSD vendors from Mushkin to Fusion-io deal with an onslaught from the vertically integrated vendors that have their own flash foundries and Western Digital’s Hitachi Global Storage Technologies (HGST) division, which is currently digesting both STEC and Virident? Only time will tell.


Related Reading


More Insights


Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 
Vendor Comparisons
Network Computing’s Vendor Comparisons provide extensive details on products and services, including downloadable feature matrices. Our categories include:

Research and Reports

Network Computing: April 2013



TechWeb Careers