Upcoming Events

Cloud Connect
Santa Clara
Feb 13-16, 2012

Cloud Connect brings together the entire cloud eco-system to better understand the transformation we're experiencing and promises to be the defining event of the cloud computing industry. Learn about the latest cloud technologies and platforms from thought leaders in Cloud Connect’s comprehensive conference.

Register Now!

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up

Email Email  Print  Share


NASg: A Low-Cost Cure For Storage Sprawl

Tags: , , ,

Channel: Storage & Mgmt, Servers & Storage, Backup & Recovery

With last week's release to beta of NASg, a network-attached storage system from Gridstore, small businesses and service providers have a new way to fight storage sprawl that doesn't involve a forklift. The solution creates a scalable storage grid costing about a third of similar solutions available today and is managed through a Microsoft Management Console snap-in. The cost of entry will start at around US$800 for one terabyte and around $300 per terabyte thereafter.

The system is built around the NASg Storage Block, a reference design with one or two Intel Atom processors running Windows XP Embedded on 1GB of RAM with a 1Gb Ethernet port and either a 1TB or 2TB SATA drive. NASg nodes appear to grid clients as an ordinary lettered Windows network drive available to applications and users. As nodes are added and virtualized, they automatically become part of the storage pool and add to storage bandwidth. An unlimited number of nodes can be added. File sharing is via CIFS (common internet file system), and on tap are iSCSI and NFS protocols. "We hope to have iSCSI by mid 2010," said Gridstore CEO Kelly Murphy in an e-mail.

With NASg, Gridstone is targeting managed service providers (MSP), whose choices for low-priced NAS systems are currently limited to a small handful of brands. "In the past, we have implemented many network [and] direct attached storage solutions, depending on the specific needs of our customer," said Gerry McHugh, director of MSP Ashelle Networks, in an e-mail interview. "The Netgear and Iomega NAS devices are the ones we have used the most, as they were probably best value for the money for the customer." Ashelle has been beta testing the NASg software on a few of its own servers, McHugh said, and for file storage on its internal network. "One of the key areas I see us using it is in the backup/DR [disaster recovery] side of things," he said.

As a Microsoft Solution Provider, most of Ashelle's work is on Microsoft platforms. It also uses Microsoft's Disaster Protection Manager, which first backs up to disk and then transfers an off-site copy to removable media. "A large amount of capacity is required for this disk version, and in the past it has been quite expensive to achieve this. The NASg devices will greatly reduce the cost."

Performance of NASg is roughly comparable to that of its competitors, wrote networking consultant Howard Marks in a recent blog post analyzing the news. "With Gridstore promising performance of 25-30MB/s per client, a four- or five-node cluster should deliver better performance than a four-bay SOHO NAS from Iomega or Netgear for about the same price." Marks, chief scientist at Networks Are Our Lives Inc., also points out that when that four-bay NAS is full, users have essentially two options: "Upgrade and migrate or, even worse, add a second NAS and spend your whole life trying to balance them."


Page:  1 | 2 |Next Page »

Related Stories

Related Reading


More servers-storage Insights



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Research and Reports

Hypervisor Derby
August 2011

Network Computing: August 2011

TechWeb Careers