Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Cengiz Alaettinoglu
Cengiz Alaettinoglu

SDN Management: Risks And Challenges

Traditional network management techniques don't work with software-defined networking. Automation of management best practices is critical for SDN to succeed.

Software-defined networking (SDN) has the potential to be transformational and disruptive, but opinions vary about how widespread adoption will be. One hindrance to adoption is network management, which tends to be an afterthought with a bright and shiny new technology. However, to help fuel SDN adoption, a conversation needs to happen now about how to manage it.

When a new application or service is installed in a traditional network, typically a planning group gets involved to assess whether or not the network is ready for it. With SDN, engineers no longer get weeks to prepare for the rollout of a new application. In fact, programmability takes the operator out of the equation.

In addition, traditional manual and device-centric management methods cannot provide the visibility needed to run a programmable network that automatically adapts to application demands. This is especially true across the dynamic, resource-constrained WAN where management is more complex than in the datacenter.

If applications and services are being rolled out without operator intervention and adequate visibility, how do you plan for them? Who or what governs whether or not these programmatic changes should be made? How do you know if the network can support a new request without negatively impacting existing applications?

Many think that if you remove error-prone humans from network planning and operations, problems won’t happen. But people do not cause many fault and performance issues. SDNs are still prone to link or node failure, software bugs, unforeseen protocol interactions, and other issues.

In addition, SDN presents brand-new challenges. For example, in a large WAN, how many controllers should you have? Where should you place them? What if two controllers talking to the same switch give conflicting instructions?

Arbitrating competing network resource requests will be critical as will setting up new paths in the first place. You will need to verify that paths are set up properly and conduct ongoing monitoring. Things like visualization of the current SDN topology will be critical, so you can understand the impact of programmatic changes.

Automating Network Management

The main challenge is being able to move today’s management practices into the automation realm. We must be able to understand what impact an application requesting resources from an SDN will have on performance. SDN creates the need to replicate traditional functions of capacity planning, monitoring, troubleshooting, security, and other critical management capabilities.

It’s less a question of needing to develop brand new ways to manage networks, but more about adapting what we know are good, robust network management techniques.

For example, route analytics is proven to improve availability and performance in the traditional network with real-time, network-wide visibility into topology details, routing events and traffic patterns. This is directly applicable to SDN, because successfully monitoring and managing SDN applications requires always-current network models and traffic load profiles as well as the ability to predict the impact of change to network routing topologies and traffic flows.

[Read why Tom Hollingsworth thinks the debates over OpenFlow, NSX and ACI miss the point in "Focus On SDN Tools Obscures SDN Benefits."]

In addition, route analytics can take advantage of the unique application insight found in SDNs, with network diagnosis, analysis and reporting that is application-aware. For instance, it can report whether the application's servers are best positioned to serve that application's user base.

All this requires more detailed and sophisticated analysis of what’s happening in the network. Vendors and the SDN community at large are mostly ignoring SDN analytics, which are crucial for:

• Troubleshooting and visualization.

• Determining the network state at any given time.

• Inspecting and replaying events learned both from the controller and the network devices.

• Comparing routing state and paths when a service/application is performing well and when it is not.

• Monitoring paths for changes in hops, metric, delay, and bandwidth.

An awareness of the management challenges of SDN is crucial, but then the industry needs the right tools to move management into the automation realm. Network professionals need the same level of visibility and control into SDNs as they do in the traditional network. This requires some new technologies as well as adaptions of existing technologies and best practices that provide the intelligence and analytics needed to address the unique challenges of software defined networking.

Only when organizations have adequate management will the promise of SDN to be transformational and disruptive be realized.

Cengiz Alaettinoglu is CTO of Packet Design.



Related Reading


More Insights



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Buying power and influence are rapidly shifting to service providers. Where does that leave enterprise IT? Not at the cutting edge, thatís for sure: Only 19% are increasing both the number and capability of servers, budgets are level or down for 60% and just 12% are using new micro technology.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.