Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series


DDoS Attacks Wreak Havoc On Data Centers

Distributed-denial-of-service attacks are a growing cause of costly data center outages, according to a new study.

Having established just how much data center professionals dread outages, the Ponemon Institute has discovered that a particular culprit has been causing them fits: distributed denial-of-service attacks.

Ponemon's latest study, the second of a two-part look at data center outages, finds that DDoS attacks, which typically target specific servers, have joined the growing list of events damaging companies' ability to keep their larger technology environments running.

DDoS attacks have become one of the most common triggers of data center outages, causing 18% of those experienced at the 67 U.S. data centers that participated in the study, which was conducted independently but sponsored by Emerson Network Power. When Ponemon first polled data centers on outages in 2010, DDoS attacks accounted for just 2% of outages.

Eric Hanselman, chief analyst at 451 Research, said via email that DDoS attacks have been growing dramatically, but it's unusual for a data center to be the real target of an attack--it's more often a case of collateral damage. DDoS attacks have increased as attack tools have improved and network speeds have increased, making it easier to generate massive amounts of dummy traffic. What happens is the primary carrier links into the data center become saturated, knocking out access to applications hosted behind them, he said.

The increasingly disruptive profile of DDoS attacks is made more problematic by the relative complexity in addressing the outages that result.

"It appears that these attacks are much more frequent and more difficult to contain than other root causes of data center outages," Larry Ponemon, founder of the privacy and security think tank that bears his name, said in an email interview. "Specifically, in most cases, dealing with these causes required specialized technologies and forensic expertise."

And it wasn't just the frequency and difficulty in overcoming outages caused by DDoS attacks that caught Ponemon's eye. "The most surprising factor was the lack of readiness or preparedness of companies," he said. "In general, we found several companies completely unprepared to deal with this type of outage event.

At the same time, DDoS attacks result in some of the most expensive outages in the data center, the study found. DDoS-spurred outages cost an average of $822,000 to mitigate, second only to the $959,000 it cost to fix outages caused by IT equipment failure. By comparison, outages caused by accidental human errors -- one of the most common triggers -- cost companies an average of $380,000.

The high costs associated with DDoS-caused outages have contributed to another data center trend the Ponemon study identified: The length of data center outages has shrunk over the past few years, but the costs of overcoming those outages have risen sharply.

Specifically, the average cost of overcoming a data center outage has grown to $690,204, a nearly 37% increase since 2010, when Ponemon pegged the average cost at $505,502. Meanwhile, the average length of an outage shrunk to 86 minutes, down from 97 minutes in 2010.

In other words, the average cost per minute jumped more than 40%, from $5,617 to $7,908, which should provide plenty of motivation for companies to address outages quicker. Ponemon said the growing use of data center infrastructure management technologies is allowing them to do just that.

[Read why the nation's power and water systems may be more susceptible to cyberattacks that previously believed in "Critical Infrastructure Vulnerabilities Unearthed."]

That said, data center outages are a reality of modern business companies must plan for, no matter how many tools they have at their disposal.

"The cost of unplanned downtime -- whether it is the entire data center or one rack of servers -- can be a huge unplanned cost for most organizations," said Ponemon. "Companies should factor the total cost consequences when planning for availability and business continuity."

Other findings from the Ponemon study include:

• Business disruption, loss of revenue and loss of user productivity together account for more than 80% of costs related to data center outages.

• Among the industries represented in the study, data centers in the communications industry faced the highest average outage costs ($976,344) while the lone hospitality industry data center that participated logged the lowest average costs of $392,922.

• Financial services, the most represented industry in the study with 10 participating data centers, experienced average outage costs of $773,286.



Related Reading


More Insights



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Buying power and influence are rapidly shifting to service providers. Where does that leave enterprise IT? Not at the cutting edge, thatís for sure: Only 19% are increasing both the number and capability of servers, budgets are level or down for 60% and just 12% are using new micro technology.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.