Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Michael Bushong
Michael Bushong VP of Marketing, Plexxi

Cisco vs. Oracle: How The Battle Will Impact The Networking Industry

With Oracle and Cisco going head-to-head after another Oracle SDN acquisition, the repercussions across the industry will be far reaching, from changes in purchase patterns to increased product bundling.

The move towards software-defined everything means new combatants stepping into the traditionally small networking boxing ring. If one of the endgames for software-defined networking (SDN) is a tighter link between applications and the network, then it was always only a matter of time before the networking guys stepped into applications and the application guys stepped into networking.

With Oracle making another acquisition in the SDN space, this appears to be playing out just as predicted. So what does this mean for the networking industry?

We’re on track for what will likely be a long journey from enterprise software into broader IT infrastructure. The future of IT is not silos of compute, storage, networking and applications but a broad portfolio of these elements. Traditional networking vendors will eventually need to expand their own reach across the infrastructure/application boundary, and the faster Oracle moves, the more quickly those changes will play out. None of this is lost on Cisco. At its Insieme coming-out party In November, CEO John Chambers didn’t talk about networking. Instead, he emphasized Cisco’s goal of being the leading IT company.

With Oracle and Cisco, two IT titans, going head-to-head and with stakes as large as the whole of IT spend, there will inevitably be big repercussions. Here are five worth watching:

1. Drivers for buying infrastructure will evolve. Today, infrastructure purchases are largely capacity-based, i.e., "I need this many new servers, which will drive this much new storage and network capacity." But is it possible that you start to see application-led sales? For example, we could hear, "I want to deploy this enterprise application for this many users across this many data centers." Over time, it is conceivable that supporting infrastructure will be pulled through. Obviously, this won’t happen overnight and it certainly won’t happen everywhere.

2. Product bundling will increase. If purchasing behaviors are around these broader IT solutions, vendors will start to bundle their products that way as well. This means that purchases at the largest enterprises will become even more about volume purchase agreements. The larger a group of product becomes, the more difficult it is to evaluate how individual components compare to others. This means that IT buyers will need to be particularly savvy in teasing apart those elements that are essential to a solution vs. those that are included only to obfuscate the actual value.

[Read why Tom Hollingsworth thinks software-defined networking has become a meaningless buzzword and why it's time to start fresh in "Is It Time for SDN 2.0?"]

3. Differentiation will move from price to value. This is one of those “oh duh!” observations that ought to be happening anyway, but it's worth pointing out that in an industry where price is not the primary differentiator, value becomes even more important. Those in buying positions will need to understand in quantifiable terms what value they are looking for. This likely requires a higher level of IT instrumentation, measurement, and ultimately, reporting.

4. Orchestration of workflows and workloads will be key. Once the universe moves to these broader solutions, there will be an even more urgent requirement to make all these disparate systems work together. As an IT architect, do you have a firm grasp over how everything interoperates? Is your solution to handle the integration yourself? Or do you envision hiring a professional services firm to handle this for you? Depending on your answer, your vendor selection process will be profoundly different.

5. The partner landscape will change. If professional services are important, what does this mean for your reseller of choice? The VARs that are adding integration skills (orchestration, DevOps and so on) will have a big advantage over those who do not. There will be large VARs who will be put out of business because they failed to identify the shifting sands and evolve with them. Is your reseller going to be an evolver or a laggard?

Those of us in the networking industry typically focus on our own industry. But disruption rarely occurs from within. If we are too insular, we will miss the moves at the periphery that could leave a lot of us out in the cold -- even those of us who call the warm West Coast our home. The software-defined takeover may be closer than we think.



Related Reading


More Insights



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Buying power and influence are rapidly shifting to service providers. Where does that leave enterprise IT? Not at the cutting edge, thatís for sure: Only 19% are increasing both the number and capability of servers, budgets are level or down for 60% and just 12% are using new micro technology.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.