5 Keys to Successful IoT Infrastructures
The Internet of Things may be among today’s most hyped technologies, but that’s not stopping some large enterprises from seeing positive results from early implementations. One example is Avnet, the $27.9 billion technology distributor that launched IoT in its global data center to better manage ambient temperatures and energy consumption. The combination of sensors and software continuously monitors temperatures and adjusts thermostats when necessary to stay within preset thresholds.
“When we had a less accurate monitoring capability, we would err on the side of caution by over-cooling the data center,” says Steve Phillips, chief information officer. “We now consume less energy and, in turn, pay less for cooling the data center than we did in the past.”
Closer energy monitoring, along with new generations of energy-efficient IT equipment, helped Avnet avoid the $8 million in capital investments it had been contemplating to upgrade its power capacity, Phillips adds.
Avnet isn’t the only enterprise taking the IoT plunge. IDC estimates that revenue in the sector could jump to $1.7 trillion in 2020 from $656 billion in 2014. But before these megagrowth trends materialize, IT planners must face a stark reality: Flashy new applications can’t deliver quantifiable business benefits unless enterprises first create a reliable, secure IT infrastructure to support hundreds or thousands of IoT endpoints and the tide of data they generate. That means embracing new IT architectures and, in some cases, investments in either cloud or on-premises enhancements to networking, computing, storage, and analytics resources.
Fortunately, IT managers have greater choices than ever when selecting and implementing foundational technology tailored for IoT. The following five fundamental considerations can help promote IoT success.
1. IoT Architectures
There isn’t a one-size-fits-all design template for IoT, and that’s good news. IT leaders can take advantage of three main options for their unique business needs.
The first is to simply tap into existing networking, computing, and storage resources, a choice Avnet was able to make after it installed numerous sensors to collect temperature data. “Handling network traffic isn’t a challenge when it’s within the data center,” Avnet’s Phillips says.
IoT implementations that send high-volume data streams over greater physical distances may benefit from a second architectural approach, known as edge computing. With this strategy, designers enable information processing near where data is being collected, often with the help of intelligent gateways. These devices perform initial filtering and analyses that separate actionable information from raw data feeds and then send higher-value results to central applications and databases. The result is less network traffic and more efficient use of storage capacities, says Peter Christy, research director at 451 Research.
But edge computing alone isn’t always practical, creating a need in some cases for a third architectural approach: public cloud or a hybrid of private and public cloud implementations. For example, clouds enable “data lakes,” off-site data stores paired with advanced analytics applications that glean detailed insights from information. “Some analytics algorithms are too resource-intensive to run at the edge and instead need server and storage space in a data center,” says Alex Glaser, a director at Harbor Research.
Choosing an architectural design isn’t purely a technology consideration and should be driven by an organization’s business needs. “There isn’t a black-and-white answer,” Christy says. “Any of the approaches may be appropriate, depending on the application.”
2. Flexible and Reliable Networks
Architectural choices will help determine the volume of IoT traffic and how far it needs to travel for subsequent processing. From there, IT managers can choose the right mix of networking capabilities.
Wireline networks are pervasive and offer a secure, ready-to-use option for industrial IoT applications running in data centers, shop floors, and warehouses. “If you have an industrial plant with a wired connection to your corporate network, that’s a great way to go,” Christy says.
Similarly, existing enterprise WiFi networks may reliably support some IoT implementations.
But the longer-transmission ranges of some IoT applications, as well as battery-consumption considerations for endpoint devices, are pushing planners to consider additional options. Traditional 3G and 4G cellular technology offers extensive coverage, high data rates, and low latency, making it a solid choice for connecting dispersed industrial machinery and sensors. But cellular’s relative high cost and battery-draining “always-on” characteristics can be an IoT roadblock. “Cellular technology will typically be used where data can’t be transmitted in some other, more cost-effective way,” Christy says.
Similarly, high costs may lead IT managers to delay adoption of emerging 5G technology. “What the high-value applications are that will justify 5G investments is still an open question,” Christy says. “The answer may depend on whether there will be applications that just aren’t possible without 5G.”
Recommended For You
The use of SaaS applications for critical business functions in enterprise branch offices is placing a strain on most traditional WAN infrastructures.
Network automation for deployment and management of digital nodes will be the key to enabling infrastructure transitions to deal with increasing bandwidth demands from subscribers.
Cloud offers unlimited resources, elastic capacity, and more. But what about established storage management practices? Is there a place for this in the cloud?
Cloud Native networking marrying net infrastructure and modern apps would allow a unison of on-prem deployments under the orchestration of Kubernetes management.
Identifying and resolving network performance issues in hybrid cloud architectures is quite challenging. Here are five tips to get you started.