Mike Fratto

Network Computing Editor


Upcoming Events

Where the Cloud Touches Down: Simplifying Data Center Infrastructure Management

Thursday, July 25, 2013
10:00 AM PT/1:00 PM ET

In most data centers, DCIM rests on a shaky foundation of manual record keeping and scattered documentation. OpManager replaces data center documentation with a single repository for data, QRCodes for asset tracking, accurate 3D mapping of asset locations, and a configuration management database (CMDB). In this webcast, sponsored by ManageEngine, you will see how a real-world datacenter mapping stored in racktables gets imported into OpManager, which then provides a 3D visualization of where assets actually are. You'll also see how the QR Code generator helps you make the link between real assets and the monitoring world, and how the layered CMDB provides a single point of view for all your configuration data.

Register Now!

A Network Computing Webinar:
SDN First Steps

Thursday, August 8, 2013
11:00 AM PT / 2:00 PM ET

This webinar will help attendees understand the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging. It will also help users decide whether SDN makes sense in their environment, and outline the first steps IT can take for testing SDN technologies.

Register Now!

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up

See more from this blogger

Amazon APIs Are Fine ... For Amazon

I lifted the title from a Sam Johnston Tweet that neatly sums up an observation I had while listening to Citrix discuss the announcement of giving CloudStack to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF). If I didn't know better, I'd say that there are many in the cloud community who are happy to capitulate standards to Amazon. What's next? Letting Cisco define networking standards?Microsoft define OS, Web content and document standards? Apple define mobile platform standards? Or Oracle define SQL standards? Granted, Amazon seems to be the market leader and certainly commands the lion's share of public cloud mind-share, but hitching the standards wagon to a vendor is a fundamental problem.

"Amazon has in many ways invented and created this market, and with what is projected to be $1 billion in ecosystem and customer revenue attached to Amazon cloud, we believe the winning cloud platform will have to have a high degree of interoperability with Amazon," said Sameer Dholakia, GM Cloud Platforms Group with Citrix, during a pre-briefing. In fact, the entire 45 minutes with him was peppered with references to how CloudStack's "commitment to this [Amazon API] compatibility is unwavering and is only getting deeper." It almost sounded like the announcement was Citrix trying to sweeten up Amazon to acquire CloudStack, rather than telling the world that CloudStack was becoming an ASF project.

Here's the crux of the problem: Standards should be developed in an open, transparent forum where all constituents can participate and no single entity can control the future of the standard. Amazon, or any other vendor, is naturally going to build APIs that support its business goals, and while there is nothing inherently wrong with a vendor looking out for its own interests, doing so also means that if you, the customer, buy into that mindset or a project/product that is aligned with that mindset, then you have tied your wagon to the vendor--in this case, Amazon.

There are other potential problems, as well.

In a CloudPundit post titled "Citrix, CloudStack, OpenStack, and the war for open-source clouds," Gartner's Lydia Leong points out "a potential intellectual property issue if Amazon ever decides to get tetchy about its rights. (Presumably, Citrix isn't being this loud about compatibility without Amazon quietly telling it, 'No, we're not going to sue you.')." Elsewhere we are seeing attacks on the "unauthorized use of an API" by a third party. Oracle going after Google's use of Java's language API in Android is a recent example.

While Amazon may never try to enforce any IP rights over it's API, it is notable that Citrix pointed out that the commercial version of CloudStack it offers also includes indemnification of suits based on its use.

"Nobody ever said Amazon has to be any more open than they are--they're the market leaders and they can be as proprietary as they like, so long as they don't claim to be open (they don't)," said Sam Johnston, president, Open Cloud Initiative. "There are a number of options for protecting intellectual property (copyrights, trademarks and patents), and the situation with the AWS APIs is at least unclear. I hope and believe a truly open API (as defined by the Open Cloud Principles) will prevail, though it's not clear to me that any of the options out there today will be it."

Relying on Amazon to set the standards for cloud APIs means tying your future to Amazon's, which may or may not be in the cloud providers' or the customers' best interests. It also means that other opportunities may not surface or be developed. There are a lot of other cloud services out there from companies that have their own APIs, including Google, Microsoft, Salesforce, Rackspace, Verizon and VMware.

What would be good for everyone--including cloud services vendors, cloud software vendors, management vendors, infrastructure vendors and customers--is a set of well-defined, vendor-neutral standards that vendors and service providers can implement that will allow them to focus on service and product features that differentiate them from competitors and give customers the ability to easily implement their workloads where they choose while being confident that they can also easily get their workloads back.

The people and organizations who are working on cloud services and software need to sit down at a table and start working on meaningful cloud standards. It's that simple.

Disclosure: I am openly and proudly pro-open standards, and I think Standards Matter: The Battle For Interoperability Goes On. However, I am also practical, and at times I think Standards Don't Matter; Vendor Choice Does and that Proprietary Is Not A Four Letter Word. I'm complicated like that. Go figure.

Mike Fratto is editor of Network Computing. You can email him, follow him on Twitter, or join the Network Computing group on LinkedIN. He's not as grumpy as he seems.


Related Reading


More Insights


Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 
Vendor Comparisons
Network Computing’s Vendor Comparisons provide extensive details on products and services, including downloadable feature matrices. Our categories include:

Research and Reports

Network Computing: April 2013



TechWeb Careers