In late 2010, I blogged about Wi-Fi Direct's arrival. Though ad hoc wireless networking has been allowed under 802.11 operations since the standard was a baby, it wasn't exactly easy to execute. Now, Wi-Fi Direct puts a friendly face on device-to-device wireless communications, and some predict that it will seriously horn in on Bluetooth's place in the grand scheme of personal connectivity. Wi-Fi Direct has higher speeds and longer ranges than Bluetooth, so it's easy to see why Wi-Fi Direct may be appealing at first blush. But it isn't the right fit in all cases, and promoting Wi-Fi Direct as the deserving executioner of Bluetooth is a bad move.
The wireless realm is one that thrives on conflicting philosophies. Devices get smaller while networks get faster, and we're willing to cram ever more devices into a shared media technology in the name of mobility and portability.
We sink big dollars into spectrum analysis tools to help identify dozens of interfering devices that we know darn well we probably can't do much about in many cases. We're happy if we see the right number of bars to simply give us a decent connection, whereas on the wire we spit nails if we aren't getting gigabit speeds. It's just a different paradigm.
Within that paradigm, we've learned certain truths. We know that some competing technologies simply can't be tolerated within the radio spectrum used by our WLAN cells, while other ones are OK. Network administrators know that, on the whole, Bluetooth is a fairly good co-inhabitant of the 2.4GHz band used by 802.11n/g/b, especially where the newer frequency-adaptive version 2.x Bluetooth tries to avoid interference with the WLAN. Even where Bluetooth does impact, the effect is usually limited due to the fast and discreet hop pattern employed and its design as a short-range personal area network (PAN) technology.
Which brings us to why Bluetooth should not be allowed to die at the hands of Wi-Fi Direct. Bluetooth knows what it is and needs to be as a PAN technology. With millions of Bluetooth keyboards, mice and headsets in use far and wide in the same spaces where enterprise WLANs operate, the de facto truth is that, despite its potential to interfere at short ranges, we like Bluetooth. We know it well, and if we lose a bit of Wi-Fi speed while we check e-mail during a meeting when the boss uses the Bluetooth keyboard during his PowerPoint presentation, so be it. We also know that no one outside of the room is impacted, and the entire WLAN/Bluetooth equation is easy enough to wrap your head around.