Performance Testing: WinPcap versus Npcap
Wireshark for Windows users are probably familiar with WinPcap. WinPcap is basically the driver that Wireshark and other applications use to communicate with their network adapters.
WinPcap is automatically installed by Wireshark, but few people know that you also could use Npcap. Npcap has a few advantages over WinPcap including:
- Support for Windows 10
- Libpcap version 1.8.1 vs WinPcap (1.0.0)
- You can create and inject loopback traffic
- You can capture raw 802.11 frames from more adapters
Those who read my articles know it was just a matter of time before I put Npcap through its paces. Since WinPcap and Npcap are both drivers, I wanted to see if there were any performance differences.
I decided to set up my traffic generator and measured how many packets Wireshark can capture with either driver.
In my tests, I decided to use Windows 8.1 since WinPcap officially supports it and the GUI interface, rather than the CLI tools. Here is the video of my test:
In conclusion, Npcap outperformed WinPcap, but I always recommend using hardware-based analyzers on ‘busy’ links.
Recommended For You
IBN is set to take network management to the next level. Is your organization ready to join the ride?
We have updated the Network Computing site to make it easier to find the information you need. Please take a look at our new features.
Low-Power WANs offer an alternative to 5G for connecting a fast-growing array of basic devices and sensors that transmit small amounts of data.
An effective network visibility strategy requires understanding the technical, financial, political, and legal aspects impacting your network operations.
Emerging organizational structures for IT include placement of IT pros in user areas and departments forming their own "micro IT's."
Comparing a good and bad trace helps identify performance issues. Dynamic baselining can be used when you do not have a good trace to reference.