Unified Communications

01:13 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

A UC Deployment's Most Important Ingredient: the VAR

Picking the right UC technology is important, but unless you have unlimited IT resources you’ll be relying on outside services for deployment, training and more. The right VAR can make a UC rollout shine.

When looking at a UC deployment, most companies focus first and foremost on the platform or the technology. However, unless you have considerable in-house UC resources, your UC system will be implemented by a value-added reseller (VAR), systems/solutions integrator (SI) or some other entity that designs the system, buys the technology from the manufacturer, and then coordinates the configuration and installation. Choosing your UC partner carefully could be the difference between a UC success and a "career-limiting situation."

There are many qualities to look for in a VAR. The most important is the VAR's breadth of experience, because of all the elements that have to come together in a UC system (network, hardware, software, integration, training and so on). If you work in a large organization with multiple locations across the country (or around the world), you must choose a VAR with the resources to support geographical diversity.

IP PBX providers that offer UC systems will typically have an extensive line-up of distributors trained in the providers' core voice, voicemail and contact center offerings. You may want to augment the distributors' knowledge with a VAR that has experience with unified messaging, video conferencing and, most importantly, integrated applications.

As I noted in an earlier blog, a lot of the value of UC comes from the ability to embed communications capabilities inside of other applications, so that users can initiate voice calls, texts, emails or even conferences directly from the screens they are working in. A company that has been selling PBXes for 20 years can make your phones ring predictably, but application integration calls for a whole different set of expertise.

A UC deployment is a long-term initiative, so it's important to look beyond your immediate requirements. Typically, individual user productivity and collaboration tools--what we refer to as UC for user productivity or UC-U--are the initial targets in a UC deployment. Those deployments add IM, presence, softphones and enhanced collaboration tools, but are still fairly close to traditional "telephony."

However, if phase two or three of the project involves getting into communications-enabled business processes or embedded communications interfaces, you must evaluate the VAR's capabilities in those areas from the start; changing VARs mid-project will leave a steep learning curve for whomever has to take over.

Of course, if you are looking at a UC solution like Microsoft's Lync or IBM's Sametime, now your concern switches to the VAR's voice capabilities. In the case of Lync, Microsoft's partners will typically be software-oriented and may or may not have any experience in telephony. Microsoft has a partner locator called Pinpoint that lets you view the certifications of all of its partners. Look for those with "communications" as a competency, particularly as a "gold" competency. As we all know, having a competency means you passed the test, so don't leave it at that. Question them about the number and complexity of the Lync telephony projects they've worked on and talk to some of their customers to see how they fared.

IBM is a different kettle of fish, as it doesn't provide telephony capabilities in Sametime per se. Rather, IBM supports a capability called Sametime Unified Telephony (SUT), in which it offers a set of APIs allowing Sametime to interface to any number of IP or even TDM PBX systems. Given IBM's rather limited base of SUT installations, finding an experienced partner may be a challenge.

In any case, you must think through the process all the way to the users. UC is not a "fire and forget" technology. Users need to be shown how UC capabilities can fit into their work lives, and they need to be trained in how UC tools operate. Given that most companies deal with limited IT resources, you'll likely be leaning on the VAR to assist in all phases of the UC project. So in picking your VAR, remember what the old knight said to Indiana Jones in The Last Crusade: "Choose wisely."

Michael Finneran is an independent consultant and industry analyst.

Michael F. Finneran, President of dBrn Associates, Inc. is a consultant and industry analyst specializing in wireless, mobile unified communications, and fixed-mobile convergence. With over 30 years in the networking field and wide range of experience, he is a widely ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Audio Interviews
Archived Audio Interviews
This radio show will provide listeners with guidance from Dell Storage experts, who can help you explore ways to simplify workload management while achieving a balance of price and performance.
Slideshows
White Papers
Register for Network Computing Newsletters
Current Issue
2014 State of Unified Communications
2014 State of Unified Communications
If you thought consumerization killed UC, think again: 70% of our 488 respondents have or plan to put systems in place. Of those, 34% will roll UC out to 76% or more of their user base. And there’s some good news for UCaaS providers.
Video
Twitter Feed
Cartoon