Alexander Wolfe

Upcoming Events

Where the Cloud Touches Down: Simplifying Data Center Infrastructure Management

Thursday, July 25, 2013
10:00 AM PT/1:00 PM ET

In most data centers, DCIM rests on a shaky foundation of manual record keeping and scattered documentation. OpManager replaces data center documentation with a single repository for data, QRCodes for asset tracking, accurate 3D mapping of asset locations, and a configuration management database (CMDB). In this webcast, sponsored by ManageEngine, you will see how a real-world datacenter mapping stored in racktables gets imported into OpManager, which then provides a 3D visualization of where assets actually are. You'll also see how the QR Code generator helps you make the link between real assets and the monitoring world, and how the layered CMDB provides a single point of view for all your configuration data.

Register Now!

A Network Computing Webinar:
SDN First Steps

Thursday, August 8, 2013
11:00 AM PT / 2:00 PM ET

This webinar will help attendees understand the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging. It will also help users decide whether SDN makes sense in their environment, and outline the first steps IT can take for testing SDN technologies.

Register Now!

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up

See more from this blogger

Unified Communications Battle: Cisco Versus Microsoft

As another umbrella technology which is attempting to integrate ease-of-use and transparency on top of an incredibly diverse collection of services, unified communications is a worthy effort. A new report, which says the overall enterprise UC market will generate $7.8 billion in revenues in 2010, sheds interesting light on the relative strengths and positioning of Cisco and Microsoft. Here are some salient excerpts.

First, a quick look at the numbers. The report, from Insight Research Corp., is entitled "The Global Market for Unified Communications: Software, Services, and Solutions 2009-2014, forecasts that the market will grow at compound annual rate of 38.7 percent, rising from an estimated $5.3 billion this year to $27.3 billion in 2014.

Some of those numbers were contained in an Insight Research press release, which teased the report. But I was really more interested in hearing what it had to say about some of the major players. I apologize for leaving out Avaya, which has a UC intro today, but for the purposes of this blog, I'm going to present to you some quick insights into Cisco (which recently acquired Tandberg) and Microsoft. I thank Insight Research's president, Robert Rosenberg, for allowing me to quote from his report.

In terms of positioning, the report says that Microsoft and Cisco have contrasting approaches to UC.  Cisco's is characterized as network-centric, while Microsoft is seen as taking an application-centric tack.

Notes the report:

"As a result of their preeminent position in the respective fields, they are the default[s] typically selected for inclusion in a UC setup.  They have thus lent a tangible structure to what is otherwise a much unstructured solutions scenario.

While Cisco's instantiation of UC components is mostly router based, Microsoft's instantiation of the very same components is server based, underlining the contrast in their approaches yielding the same results.  Both the vendors have an impressive web of partners leading to a large installed base.  In fact, practically every UC solutions vendor has close interoperability with offerings of either or both of them.

Cisco and Microsoft should also be credited for achieving the mammoth task of raising customer awareness of UC."

Here's a little more individual perspective on the UC positioning of the two companies. On Cisco:

"What is striking is the centrality accorded by Cisco to the network infrastructure.  The reason for this is the extensive network devices and peripheral portfolio owned by Cisco, which it is projecting as a part of its UC offerings. Cisco can rightfully claim that it is being faithful to the letter and spirit of UC, which is primarily communications driven.

Cisco puts great stress on the fact that UC is IP driven, a fact which makes UC extremely synergistic to Cisco's business objectives.

Cisco is one of the few vendors that have the resources to supply top ranking products across all the UC component domains."

Here's some of what the report has to say about Microsoft:

"Microsoft is the champion proponent of software-driven architecture solutions. The success of Microsoft in UC is an eloquent testimony to the fact that UC is not just about networking, but about applications.  There can thus be no better example of how the communication OEM-only mainstay of enterprise networking is crumbling to other stakeholders than studying the texture and impact of Microsoft's UC solution.

Microsoft views UC as one of the important gateways into the enterprise communications applications market.  As is typical of Microsoft, it is treading on this path on its own terms and from a position of strength.

Microsoft has altered the face of enterprise networking gear by introducing server-based architecture in place of the traditional router-based version.  In doing so, Microsoft has thrown the field wide open to other ISVs without impressive telecom pedigrees to explore the market purely on the basis of their software skills."

In analyzing the competitive stance of Cisco and Microsoft towards each other, the report makes the interesting conclusion that, while the two have come at UC from opposite quarters, they are now trying to be more like each other.

More on the report is available on the Insight Research site, here.

For ongoing, in-depth coverage of the UC marketplace, see our sister site, No Jitter.

Follow me on Twitter. Write to me at

Related Reading

More Insights

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
Vendor Comparisons
Network Computing’s Vendor Comparisons provide extensive details on products and services, including downloadable feature matrices. Our categories include:

Research and Reports

Network Computing: April 2013

TechWeb Careers