There is no doubt that EMC is watching Dell and trying to determine if they will continue to have a strong and viable storage distribution partnership with the company. EMC's CLARiiON and Symmetrix lines--as they are today--seem not to fit in the Dell vision of their upper mid-range or enterprise class storage offerings. Mainly, the price/feature function combination with EMC can't be right for Dell or they wouldn't have gone after 3Par in the first place. While EMC has grown enormously over the years, they still understand listening to the customer and supplying what the customer wants.
Granted, there are probably more than few ruffled feathers at EMC over Dell's storage actions of late (acquiring iSCSI provider EqualLogic, and now the bidding for 3Par). However, as the latest dust settles, getting back to the basics of business will be natural for EMC and Dell, and it's in EMC's best interest to work with Dell and try to provide the kind of advancements and price flexibility that their customers require. Will Dell now try to acquire another storage company? Perhaps, and we will look at that in a moment.
HP now has the opportunity to reposition its storage line up. Perhaps it's time to phase out the EVA and finally work toward eliminating the costly and aging XP (Hitachi Universal Storage Platform, or USP) architecture. The Hitachi architecture appears stalled, new advancements aren't coming to market in rapid fire succession any longer, and enterprise customers are growing weary of the complexity of the product and the expensive professional services that come along with it. Reportedly, the latest IDC Quarterly Disk Storage Systems Tracker indicates Hitachi Data Systems' (HDS) storage market share results are below 10 percent for the fifth consecutive quarter, keeping them in the "other" category below HP and Dell. HDS is the global direct sales arm of Hitachi, Ltd. These results may be further indication of the sluggishness of sales of the USP. It's worth noting that IDC does not count HDS sales that are OEM sales through either SUN or HP.
With a potential elimination of the XP as a possibility, can 3Par InServ architecture scale for the HP enterprise customer? Can InServ provide the high availability features functions like that of the XP? In my opinion, the simple answer is yes. The more complex answer revolves around the question of how much money HP is willing to inject into R&D for InServ. Given the purchase price for 3Par, it's my opinion that HP will be willing to invest heavily to enable the InServ architecture as its new flagship line, scaling from the mid-range storage requirement with the F-Class all the way through to the very high-end and high-availability requirements with the T-Class, with new classes of InServ offerings to come.