Storage

11:46 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Flash Dependent Storage Systems Take Off In 2012

Whether flash-only, or a combination of flash and mechanical storage, the technology is poised for significant gains.

The continued problems caused by rapid storage growth and virtualization promise to make 2012 a busy year for storage managers. They are the key drivers behind what I feel are going to be the top storage trends in 2012.

In our first entry on 2012 storage trends, we look at an aspect of flash-based storage, not that flash storage is suddenly a trend--it's reality. What is a trend, though, is the move to flash-dependent systems.

Flash-dependent storage systems are systems that are either all-flash or systems where flash plays a critical role in the delivery of data. The first to keep an eye on are flash-only storage systems. These are different than solid date drives (SSDs) or solid-state storage appliances; they are complete storage systems with typically a robust storage feature set like snapshots and replication. They are designed to compete directly with traditional legacy storage systems instead of augment them like other solid-state storage solutions do.

Their big differentiator is that there is no mechanical disk storage in them. To keep costs down, these vendors use technologies like thin provisioning, cloning, and deduplication to reduce the cost per gigabyte concern that you would typically have when considering flash-based media. There is no doubt that the above combination of technologies can drive the cost per gigabyte of flash-based media into the realm of a high-performance 15K RPM hard drive-based system.

There are flash-dependent systems where flash plays a critical role in the delivery of data to the application but still have some form of mechanical storage available to them. These systems are typically using flash as a cache, as we discussed in our article "The Advantages Of Storage System Based Caching" or they're using flash as a primary tier. In both cases flash is designed to augment the use of high-capacity SATA-based mechanical hard disk (HDD) drives instead of lower capacity high-performance SAS-based hard drives. The goal of these systems is to deliver better performance than a storage system configured with high-performance hard drives and no flash, but do so at a lower price point. The combination of HDD and flash allows for a much smaller allocation of memory-based storage which also helps keep prices down.

The key difference is the sensitivity to, or likelihood of, a cache- or memory-based tier miss, which would mean that data has to be retrieved from the mechanical hard drive storage tier. In flash-only systems there is no chance of a miss, but there is a likelihood of a higher cost.

If you are looking for a new high-performance storage system to solve a broad range of application performance problems the flash-only systems certainly warrant strong consideration, especially if the data is not cache friendly. If you need a new storage system but your performance needs are more modest, where an occasional access from a mechanical hard drive storage tier and the resulting lower performance is not an issue for you, than a flash-dependent system may be a better option.

If your current storage solution performs admirably but you need a performance boost for a very specific application set, then one of the more traditional solid-state storage appliances or servers with installed PCIe-based solid-state storage devices may be more appropriate.

In reality we think that most will end up with a combination of server-based caching, typically via a PCIe solid-state storage device and either a flash-only system or flash-dependent system.

Track us on Twitter

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Find Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement here.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Guest
50%
50%
Guest,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/7/2012 | 2:25:13 AM
re: Flash Dependent Storage Systems Take Off In 2012
Not sure about this one. There is a demand for Flash based storage systems, but the workloads which need Flash response time are pretty rare. People would like their ERP, e-mail, BI, etc systems to run faster, but they don't really care enough to justify the additional costs. It will take a ramp up in production and a drop in price before all-SSD storage systems become mainstream. The use of Flash for hot-objects is becoming pretty common.
GeorgeCrump
50%
50%
GeorgeCrump,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/10/2012 | 6:22:45 PM
re: Flash Dependent Storage Systems Take Off In 2012
SimonS1 - thanks for reading and for the response. I agree that Flash only systems have their work gut out for them to get pricing to the levels. But to a large extent we are there when comparing flash only systems to 15k mechanical drive systems. Also for the business that would like their "ERP, e-mail, BI, etc..." to run faster they can use systems that integrate flash. We discuss this concept in our recent article "Integrating PCIe SSD Into The Storage System"

http://www.storage-switzerland...
Guest
50%
50%
Guest,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/18/2012 | 6:57:21 PM
re: Flash Dependent Storage Systems Take Off In 2012
I think we agree with each other. I am not saying that Flash will never replace disk. It will definitely, without a doubt replace disk as the price continues to come down and capacities increase. The technology is across the board superior to disk. I am just not sure that 2012 will be the year (as the title states) when Flash dependent systems take off and start replacing disk arrays in substantial numbers. It is like tape vs. disk. Disk is way better than tape all around and has largely replaced tape for everything other than archiving and back-up, but it didn't happen overnight. I think you will see Flash integrated with disk systems, which already exists, and then as the Flash technology matures people will ditch disk altogether.

BI will be the first to go all Flash as the software already supports it and the data volumes (a couple of hundred GB) are relatively small. For the 10s of TB RDB workloads and hundreds or even PB unstructured workloads, it will probably take a few years at least.
Cartoon
Hot Topics
6
The Rise Of White-Box Storage
Jim O'Reilly, Consultant,  8/27/2014
6
VMware Launches Hyper-Converged Infrastructure Appliance
Marcia Savage, Managing Editor, Network Computing,  8/25/2014
4
Cloud Storage Security: AWS Vs. Azure
Anna Andreeva, security quality assurance engineer, A1QA,  8/26/2014
White Papers
Register for Network Computing Newsletters
Current Issue
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed