Tom Trainer

Network Computing Blogger


Upcoming Events

Cloud Connect
Santa Clara
Feb 13-16, 2012

Cloud Connect brings together the entire cloud eco-system to better understand the transformation we're experiencing and promises to be the defining event of the cloud computing industry. Learn about the latest cloud technologies and platforms from thought leaders in Cloud Connect’s comprehensive conference.

Register Now!

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up

What Will Dell Do Now?

For a company that prides itself on listening to its customers and delivering more than just what meets requirements, EMC received the message loud and clear from Dell about what the company is looking for in an enterprise class storage product: like a 3Par InServ. Can EMC deliver an enterprise storage array for Dell? Will Dell select a new acquisition target? Now that HP has won the bidding war, what will Dell do now?

There is no doubt that EMC is watching Dell and trying to determine if they will continue to have a strong and viable storage distribution partnership with the company. EMC's CLARiiON and Symmetrix lines--as they are today--seem not to fit in the Dell vision of their upper mid-range or enterprise class storage offerings. Mainly, the price/feature function combination with EMC can't be right for Dell or they wouldn't have gone after 3Par in the first place. While EMC has grown enormously over the years, they still understand listening to the customer and supplying what the customer wants.  

Granted, there are probably more than few ruffled feathers at EMC over Dell's storage actions of late (acquiring iSCSI provider EqualLogic, and now the bidding for 3Par). However, as the latest dust settles, getting back to the basics of business will be natural for EMC and Dell, and it's in EMC's best interest to work with Dell and try to provide the kind of advancements and price flexibility that their customers require. Will Dell now try to acquire another storage company? Perhaps, and we will look at that in a moment.  

HP now has the opportunity to reposition its storage line up. Perhaps it's time to phase out the EVA and finally work toward eliminating the costly and aging XP (Hitachi Universal Storage Platform, or USP) architecture. The Hitachi architecture appears stalled, new advancements aren't coming to market in rapid fire succession any longer, and enterprise customers are growing weary of the complexity of the product and the expensive professional services that come along with it. Reportedly, the latest IDC Quarterly Disk Storage Systems Tracker indicates Hitachi Data Systems' (HDS) storage market share results are below 10 percent for the fifth consecutive quarter, keeping them in the "other" category below HP and Dell. HDS is the global direct sales arm of Hitachi, Ltd. These results may be further indication of the sluggishness of sales of the USP. It's worth noting that IDC does not count HDS sales that are OEM sales through either SUN or HP.

With a potential elimination of the XP as a possibility, can 3Par InServ architecture scale for the HP enterprise customer? Can InServ provide the high availability features functions like that of the XP? In my opinion, the simple answer is yes. The more complex answer revolves around the question of how much money HP is willing to inject into R&D for InServ. Given the purchase price for 3Par, it's my opinion that HP will be willing to invest heavily to enable the InServ architecture as its new flagship line, scaling from the mid-range storage requirement with the F-Class all the way through to the very high-end and high-availability requirements with the T-Class, with new classes of InServ offerings to come.


Page:  1 | 2 |Next Page »

Related Reading


More storage-networking-management Insights



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Research and Reports

Hypervisor Derby
August 2011

Network Computing: August 2011

TechWeb Careers