Oracle Places Its Storage Strategy Bets
Posted by
David Hill
July 14, 2011
Key Oracle executives--President Mark Hurd, Executive VP of Systems John Fowler and Senior VP of Storage Phil Bullinger--unveiled the company’s storage strategy a day after the official announcement of Oracle’s acquisition of Pillar Data Systems. Although that deal is noteworthy, it should not distract from Oracle leveraging its traditional product strengths to strengthen its overall storage position.
Note that while Oracle is best known for a database heritage (much like major competitors HP and IBM are known for their server heritage and EMC is known for its storage heritage), it has expanded to be an information infrastructure company, in part through its acquisition of Sun Microsystems. Although no major IT vendor does or needs to do everything in the information infrastructure arena, storage is an area that each wants to be strong in.
Oracle has decided to strengthen its focus on storage through four "pillars" (no pun intended) of its solution portfolio:
Frankly, and even the company is likely to agree privately, the Oracle storage portfolio has nowhere the breadth and depth of any of its major competitors' (systems from EMC, HP and IBM), and any best-of-breed product claims could be successfully contested by those three competitors, as well as by Dell, NetApp and others. However, dismissing Oracle’s storage portfolio out of hand would be a mistake.
To understand why, we need to understand how the company is playing its cards. Even though we have to be careful not to extend the analogy too far, consider that in some games, players can get one or more cards (sometimes for purchase) to improve their chances. In this parlance, Pillar Data Systems qualifies as another Oracle card.
The question is, how strong a card is it? For whatever reason, Pillar has not had the success of some of its competitors, including Dell (with Compellent), EMC, HP (with 3PAR) and IBM. However, cut Oracle a little slack, as it just acquired the company. Oracle may have some ideas about how the Axiom architecture can play well with its traditional products, but it needs time to explore, develop, and announce what those would be.
Page: 1 | 2 |3 |Next Page »
Related Reading
More Insights
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |











