<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Network Computing</title>
        <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com</link>
        <description>Network Computing</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012, UBM LLC.</copyright>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[8 Cloud-based IT Management Tools]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[With IT management becoming increasing more complex, administrators need all the help they can get. A growing number of IT tools are being delivered via Software as a Service (SaaS), which promises fast deployment and lets customers pay only for the services they use. Here are 8 SaaS IT management tools that automate IT services, help troubleshoot problems, and provide visibility into the status of network devices and applications.]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[With IT management becoming increasing more complex, administrators need all the help they can get. A growing number of IT tools are being delivered via Software as a Service (SaaS), which promises fast deployment and lets customers pay only for the services they use. Here are 8 SaaS IT management tools that automate IT services, help troubleshoot problems, and provide visibility into the status of network devices and applications.]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/cloud-computing/8-cloud-based-it-management-tools/240156902</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/cloud-computing/8-cloud-based-it-management-tools/240156902</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/cloud-computing</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcia Savage]]></dc:creator>
                        
						<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Next Gen Network]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Public Cloud]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[SaaS IT management]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ IT management tools]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ cloud-based IT management]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Software-as-a-Service]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ hosted network monitoring]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ ServiceNow]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ AppNeta]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ LogicMonitor]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ ManageEngine]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:19 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[HP's Turnaround: It's Time To Believe]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[Not only does CEO Meg Whitman seem to have a solid strategy, but there's plenty of evidence it's starting to work. Maybe it's time for skeptics like me to admit we're wrong.]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[Not only does CEO Meg Whitman seem to have a solid strategy, but there's plenty of evidence it's starting to work. Maybe it's time for skeptics like me to admit we're wrong.]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/servers-storage/hps-turnaround-its-time-to-believe/240156799</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/servers-storage/hps-turnaround-its-time-to-believe/240156799</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/servers-storage</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt Marko]]></dc:creator>
                        
						<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[HP turnaround]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Meg Whitman]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Moonshot]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ HP transformation]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Leo Apotheker]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Autonomy]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:53 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[NSA PRISM Violates Rights, Fails to Protect Say Readers]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[Revelations about NSA&#8217;s PRISM program and the collection of phone records have sparked debate about data gathering and government surveillance. Network Computing&#8217;s readers weigh in.]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[Revelations about NSA&#8217;s PRISM program and the collection of phone records have sparked debate about data gathering and government surveillance. Network Computing&#8217;s readers weigh in.]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/security/nsa-prism-violates-rights-fails-to-prote/240156697</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/security/nsa-prism-violates-rights-fails-to-prote/240156697</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/security</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Conry Murray]]></dc:creator>
                        
						<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking & Mgmt]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ security]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Franklin]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ liberty]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ snooping]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ terrorism]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ attacks]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:35 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Will IT Departments Disappear By 2020?]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[
<P>
IT as we know it could disappear by the end of the decade, killed off by the relentless consumerization of technology.</p>
 
<P>

If it does disappear, that will be a problem, because it's the chief information officer who is best placed to use technology to change business and break down internal organizational barriers.</p>
 
<P>

These and other thought-provoking ideas about the future of IT came from Forrester Research at its CIO Forum held in London this week.</p>
<P>

<P>
"CIOs are in a unique and potentially powerful position for business transformation," VP and principal analyst Marc Cecere told European IT leaders. "After the strategy phase, 80% of the work and activity falls under the role of the CIO, so a strong role for a CIO is a given."</p>
<P>

<P>
But, he cautioned, the CIO needs to "to understand their base of power." By that, Cecere seemed to mean that CIOs need to know how they are perceived by their company -- as an order-taker (a "soldier") or as a more dynamic transformation agent -- and act accordingly.</p>]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[
<P>
IT as we know it could disappear by the end of the decade, killed off by the relentless consumerization of technology.</p>
 
<P>

If it does disappear, that will be a problem, because it's the chief information officer who is best placed to use technology to change business and break down internal organizational barriers.</p>
 
<P>

These and other thought-provoking ideas about the future of IT came from Forrester Research at its CIO Forum held in London this week.</p>
<P>

<P>
"CIOs are in a unique and potentially powerful position for business transformation," VP and principal analyst Marc Cecere told European IT leaders. "After the strategy phase, 80% of the work and activity falls under the role of the CIO, so a strong role for a CIO is a given."</p>
<P>

<P>
But, he cautioned, the CIO needs to "to understand their base of power." By that, Cecere seemed to mean that CIOs need to know how they are perceived by their company -- as an order-taker (a "soldier") or as a more dynamic transformation agent -- and act accordingly.</p>]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/will-it-departments-disappear-by-2020/3611?wc=4</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/will-it-departments-disappear-by-2020/3611?wc=4</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/public-cloud-tech-center?wc=4</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
            			<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Public Cloud]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:41 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[NSA Prism: Inside The Modern Surveillance State]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[
<P>
Dystopia used to seem sexier. In George Orwell's 1984 , Big Brother used non-stop wars and ever-present surveillance to keep the population in check. A stray glance or thoughtcrime might send you to the slammer. Who wouldn't rebel against that?</p>
 
<P>

In today's increasingly wired -- and wireless -- world, however, the surveillance situation is much more banal: Under the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/security/government/nsa-prism-creates-stir-but-appears-legal/240156233">NSA's Prism program</a>, APIs installed on servers running at Google, Facebook, Microsoft and other technology giants give government spooks access to meta-data relating to communications and phone calls. It is signals intelligence meets big data and analytics, with a self-writing sales pitch that seems tailor-made for the Big Three: "Mass surveillance to monitor for suspected terrorists across the entire United States, for only $20 million." Data storage, no doubt, costs extra.</p>
 
To top it all off, the design of the top secret Prism PowerPoint documents -- leaked by Edward Snowden, 29, an employee of Booz Allen Hamilton who's done contract work for U.S. intelligence agencies -- are, in the words of renowned design guru Edward Tufte, "dreadful."
<P>

<P>
But the biggest problem with the NSA's program is that it has all the hallmarks of an "engineering first" mindset, along these lines: With all of that metadata floating in the ether, why not build it and see what secrets it might reveal? The same philosophy appeared to be behind Google's Street View program, in which a "rogue engineer" pursued wardriving by design, capturing Wi-Fi data for later analysis. Numerous governments fined Google for privacy violations.</p>]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[
<P>
Dystopia used to seem sexier. In George Orwell's 1984 , Big Brother used non-stop wars and ever-present surveillance to keep the population in check. A stray glance or thoughtcrime might send you to the slammer. Who wouldn't rebel against that?</p>
 
<P>

In today's increasingly wired -- and wireless -- world, however, the surveillance situation is much more banal: Under the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/security/government/nsa-prism-creates-stir-but-appears-legal/240156233">NSA's Prism program</a>, APIs installed on servers running at Google, Facebook, Microsoft and other technology giants give government spooks access to meta-data relating to communications and phone calls. It is signals intelligence meets big data and analytics, with a self-writing sales pitch that seems tailor-made for the Big Three: "Mass surveillance to monitor for suspected terrorists across the entire United States, for only $20 million." Data storage, no doubt, costs extra.</p>
 
To top it all off, the design of the top secret Prism PowerPoint documents -- leaked by Edward Snowden, 29, an employee of Booz Allen Hamilton who's done contract work for U.S. intelligence agencies -- are, in the words of renowned design guru Edward Tufte, "dreadful."
<P>

<P>
But the biggest problem with the NSA's program is that it has all the hallmarks of an "engineering first" mindset, along these lines: With all of that metadata floating in the ether, why not build it and see what secrets it might reveal? The same philosophy appeared to be behind Google's Street View program, in which a "rogue engineer" pursued wardriving by design, capturing Wi-Fi data for later analysis. Numerous governments fined Google for privacy violations.</p>]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/nsa-prism-inside-the-modern-surveillance/3625?wc=4</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/nsa-prism-inside-the-modern-surveillance/3625?wc=4</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/security?wc=4</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
            			<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Search]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking & Mgmt]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Storage & Mgmt]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:17 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Data Center Decision Time: Stay Or Go?]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[
<P>
Bits and bytes are the basics of our business, and business is good. So much so that even the immense capacity of advanced data centers can't keep up with demand. And complexity? Off the charts. Now the question is, does continuing to manage your own data center facilities make financial sense?</p>
<P>
<p?That might seem like a contrarian takeaway from our InformationWeek 2013 State of the Data Center Survey, given that all respondents are involved with management or decision-making at organizations with data centers of 1,000 square feet or larger. In fact, the percentage of respondents whose operating centers are at least 25,000 square feet jumped four points from our 2012 survey, to 15%.</p>
<P>

<P>
The enterprise-owned glass house is alive and well: Our survey shows just 4% of respondents aggressively moving applications to the public cloud, and another 4% of survey respondents expect demand for data center resources to decrease, compared with 69% expecting increases. Many are girding for upticks of 25% or more. At that pace, enterprises can't further virtualize or build new facilities fast enough to keep up, even if they could afford to -- which many can't, given that spending on data center facilities and associated infrastructure is little changed year over year.</p>
<P>

<P>
After you've consolidated existing facilities and servers to the limit, what then?</p>
<P>

<P>
To get more done with the same physical resources and people, CIOs might look to such cutting-edge technologies as self-service private clouds; software-defined networks and storage; and high-density, low-power servers. They can off-load commodity IT services such as email, unstructured data backup and public-facing websites to public cloud and software-as-a-service providers. But is that enough, given how fast demand for application resources, storage, network capacity and services is rising?</p>]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[
<P>
Bits and bytes are the basics of our business, and business is good. So much so that even the immense capacity of advanced data centers can't keep up with demand. And complexity? Off the charts. Now the question is, does continuing to manage your own data center facilities make financial sense?</p>
<P>
<p?That might seem like a contrarian takeaway from our InformationWeek 2013 State of the Data Center Survey, given that all respondents are involved with management or decision-making at organizations with data centers of 1,000 square feet or larger. In fact, the percentage of respondents whose operating centers are at least 25,000 square feet jumped four points from our 2012 survey, to 15%.</p>
<P>

<P>
The enterprise-owned glass house is alive and well: Our survey shows just 4% of respondents aggressively moving applications to the public cloud, and another 4% of survey respondents expect demand for data center resources to decrease, compared with 69% expecting increases. Many are girding for upticks of 25% or more. At that pace, enterprises can't further virtualize or build new facilities fast enough to keep up, even if they could afford to -- which many can't, given that spending on data center facilities and associated infrastructure is little changed year over year.</p>
<P>

<P>
After you've consolidated existing facilities and servers to the limit, what then?</p>
<P>

<P>
To get more done with the same physical resources and people, CIOs might look to such cutting-edge technologies as self-service private clouds; software-defined networks and storage; and high-density, low-power servers. They can off-load commodity IT services such as email, unstructured data backup and public-facing websites to public cloud and software-as-a-service providers. But is that enough, given how fast demand for application resources, storage, network capacity and services is rising?</p>]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/data-center-decision-time-stay-or-go/3621?wc=4</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/data-center-decision-time-stay-or-go/3621?wc=4</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/data-center?wc=4</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
            			<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking & Mgmt]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Servers & Storage]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Private Cloud]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Public Cloud]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 08:50 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[China To America: You Hack Us, Too]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[
<P>
Numerous online attacks against China have been traced back to U.S. servers. But unlike authorities in the United States, the Chinese government chooses to not point the finger, according to the head of the country's computer emergency response team.</p>
 
<P>

<a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2013-06/05/content_16569726.htm">"We have mountains of data, if we wanted to accuse the U.S.</a>, but it's not helpful in solving the problem," Huang Chengqing, the director of the National Computer Network Emergency Response Technical Team Coordination Center of China (CNCERT), told government-run media outlet China Daily Wednesday.</p>
<P>

<P>
According to data published by CNCERT, in the first three months of 2013, 5.6 million systems in China were infected by malware tied to 13,400 command-and-control servers located overseas. Of those, more than half of infected systems -- 2.9 million PCs -- were controlled by about 4,000 command-and-control servers based in the United States. Meanwhile, 3,500 U.S. systems had been used to take over about 7,700 different websites located in China.</p>
<P>

<P>
In the same timeframe, CNCERT reported that 54 U.S.-based IP addresses had "hijacked Chinese official websites to steal data," which according to China Daily included sites related to "government departments, key information systems and research institutions."</p>]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[
<P>
Numerous online attacks against China have been traced back to U.S. servers. But unlike authorities in the United States, the Chinese government chooses to not point the finger, according to the head of the country's computer emergency response team.</p>
 
<P>

<a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2013-06/05/content_16569726.htm">"We have mountains of data, if we wanted to accuse the U.S.</a>, but it's not helpful in solving the problem," Huang Chengqing, the director of the National Computer Network Emergency Response Technical Team Coordination Center of China (CNCERT), told government-run media outlet China Daily Wednesday.</p>
<P>

<P>
According to data published by CNCERT, in the first three months of 2013, 5.6 million systems in China were infected by malware tied to 13,400 command-and-control servers located overseas. Of those, more than half of infected systems -- 2.9 million PCs -- were controlled by about 4,000 command-and-control servers based in the United States. Meanwhile, 3,500 U.S. systems had been used to take over about 7,700 different websites located in China.</p>
<P>

<P>
In the same timeframe, CNCERT reported that 54 U.S.-based IP addresses had "hijacked Chinese official websites to steal data," which according to China Daily included sites related to "government departments, key information systems and research institutions."</p>]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/china-to-america-you-hack-us-too/3581?wc=4</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/china-to-america-you-hack-us-too/3581?wc=4</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/security?wc=4</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
            			<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking & Mgmt]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:20 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[IBM Targets Fortune 500 With SoftLayer Acquisition]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[IBM's purchase of cloud provider SoftLayer show how serious Big Blue is about beefing up its enterprise services business. The acquisition comes with important technology, new customer segments and substantial capacity.]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[IBM's purchase of cloud provider SoftLayer show how serious Big Blue is about beefing up its enterprise services business. The acquisition comes with important technology, new customer segments and substantial capacity.]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/cloud-computing/ibm-targets-fortune-500-with-softlayer-a/240156117</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/cloud-computing/ibm-targets-fortune-500-with-softlayer-a/240156117</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/cloud-computing</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt Marko]]></dc:creator>
                        
						<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Next Gen Network]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Private Cloud]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking & Mgmt]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Public Cloud]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ SoftLayer]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ acquisition]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ cloud computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ public cloud]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ hybrid cloud]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:45 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Data Center Demand Drives Growth in Risky Areas]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[The U.S. is the safest place to build a data center, according to a new study, but global demand is driving construction worldwide.]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[The U.S. is the safest place to build a data center, according to a new study, but global demand is driving construction worldwide.]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/next-generation-data-center/servers/data-center-demand-drives-growth-in-risk/240156044</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/next-generation-data-center/servers/data-center-demand-drives-growth-in-risk/240156044</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/next-generation-data-center/servers</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fogarty]]></dc:creator>
                        
						<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[Cushman & Wakefield]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Data Centre Risk Index]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ United States]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ IDC]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Datacenter Dynamics]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 14:23 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Cisco Announces Meraki Cloud-Managed Network Service]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[Cisco has introduced the Cisco Meraki Managed Services Dashboard, which lets managed service providers run their customers' WLANs and wired networks.]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[Cisco has introduced the Cisco Meraki Managed Services Dashboard, which lets managed service providers run their customers' WLANs and wired networks.]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/wireless/cisco-announces-meraki-cloud-managed-net/240156040</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/wireless/cisco-announces-meraki-cloud-managed-net/240156040</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/wireless</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee H. Badman]]></dc:creator>
                        
						<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Next Gen Network]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking & Mgmt]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Meraki]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ WLAN]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ wireless]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ network]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ MSP]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ managed service]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Aerohive]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:53 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Google and VMware: A Contrast in Cloud Architectures]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[VMware's vCloud Hybrid is built for Virtualization 1.0. Google's new Compute and App Engine enhancements target apps that are built for the cloud from the start.]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[VMware's vCloud Hybrid is built for Virtualization 1.0. Google's new Compute and App Engine enhancements target apps that are built for the cloud from the start.]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/next-gen-network-tech-center/google-and-vmware-a-contrast-in-cloud-ar/240155727</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/next-gen-network-tech-center/google-and-vmware-a-contrast-in-cloud-ar/240155727</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/next-gen-network-tech-center</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt Marko]]></dc:creator>
                        
						<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Public Cloud]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking & Mgmt]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Private Cloud]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Next Gen Network]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ App Engine]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Compute Engine]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ VMware]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ vCloud Hybrid Cloud]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 13:51 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Strike Back If China Steals IP, Companies Told]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[
<P>
When online attackers operating from China or other countries steal corporate secrets, let businesses strike back and retrieve stolen information from attackers' networks.</p>
 
<P>

That gloves-off approach is just one of many recommendations for combating industrial espionage outlined in a new <a href="http://www.ipcommission.org/report/IP_Commission_Report_052213.pdf">report</a> from the Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property, which is headed by the former director of national intelligence, Dennis Blair, as well as Jon Huntsman, who's served as the governor of Utah as well as U.S. ambassador to China.</p>
<P>

<P>
"China is two-thirds of the intellectual property theft problem, and we are at a point where it is robbing us of innovation to bolster their own industry, at a cost of millions of jobs," Huntsman told The New York Times. "We need some realistic policy options that create a real cost for this activity because the Chinese leadership is sensitive to those costs."</p>
<P>

<P>
The report offers 21 specific recommendations, including increasing the budget of the FBI and Department of Justice to investigate trade theft and amending U.S. counter-espionage laws to allow businesses that suffer intellectual property (IP) theft to sue foreign organizations for damages. It also advocates longer-term measures, such as rating countries on their ability to protect IP, as well as ensuring that U.S. officials "push to move China, in particular, beyond a policy of indigenous innovation toward becoming a self-innovating economy."</p>]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[
<P>
When online attackers operating from China or other countries steal corporate secrets, let businesses strike back and retrieve stolen information from attackers' networks.</p>
 
<P>

That gloves-off approach is just one of many recommendations for combating industrial espionage outlined in a new <a href="http://www.ipcommission.org/report/IP_Commission_Report_052213.pdf">report</a> from the Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property, which is headed by the former director of national intelligence, Dennis Blair, as well as Jon Huntsman, who's served as the governor of Utah as well as U.S. ambassador to China.</p>
<P>

<P>
"China is two-thirds of the intellectual property theft problem, and we are at a point where it is robbing us of innovation to bolster their own industry, at a cost of millions of jobs," Huntsman told The New York Times. "We need some realistic policy options that create a real cost for this activity because the Chinese leadership is sensitive to those costs."</p>
<P>

<P>
The report offers 21 specific recommendations, including increasing the budget of the FBI and Department of Justice to investigate trade theft and amending U.S. counter-espionage laws to allow businesses that suffer intellectual property (IP) theft to sue foreign organizations for damages. It also advocates longer-term measures, such as rating countries on their ability to protect IP, as well as ensuring that U.S. officials "push to move China, in particular, beyond a policy of indigenous innovation toward becoming a self-innovating economy."</p>]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/strike-back-if-china-steals-ip-companies/3428?wc=4</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/strike-back-if-china-steals-ip-companies/3428?wc=4</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/security?wc=4</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
            			<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Content Management]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[WAN Security]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:37 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[IT Vendors Need More Pricing Transparency]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[Compiling our SDN product comparison provided a vivid lesson in the difficulty of getting meaningful prices for enterprise IT equipment.]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[Compiling our SDN product comparison provided a vivid lesson in the difficulty of getting meaningful prices for enterprise IT equipment.]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/data-networking-management/it-vendors-need-more-pricing-transparenc/240155452</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/data-networking-management/it-vendors-need-more-pricing-transparenc/240155452</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/data-networking-management</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt Marko]]></dc:creator>
                        
						<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Next Gen Network]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[SDN]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ software defined networks]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Plexxi]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ buyer's guide]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ vendor comparison]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:37 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Dell Launches New Cloud Products For Citrix Users]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[
<P>
Two very large clouds have been hanging over Dell for most of the year: the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/desktop/pc-market-bleeds-windows-8-tablet-fix-ne/240152706 ">flailing PC market</a>, and CEO Michael Dell's ongoing <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/desktop/dell-earnings-may-disappoint/240154986">attempt to take the company private</a>. Despite these distractions, Dell itself has spent 2013 doing exactly <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/desktop/michael-dell-our-transformation-is-compl/240144292">what it did at the end of 2012</a>: launching new enterprise products and declaring that its transition from PC maker to end-to-end solution provider has concluded.</p>
 
<P>

That trend continued Wednesday at the Citrix Synergy conference in Anaheim, where Dell <a href="http://en.community.dell.com/dell-blogs/direct2dell/b/direct2dell/archive/2013/05/22/dell-supports-citrix-xendesktop-7.aspx">announced a range of cloud computing products for Citrix-based environments</a>, including options that support Citrix XenDesktop 7, also unveiled on Wednesday. Dell hopes the moves will diversify its revenue streams, which are currently reliant on its low-margin PC business.</p>
<P>

<P>
The announcements include a version of Dell's Active System 800 converged infrastructure line optimized for Citrix XenDesktop. The product is a pre-integrated system that fits server, storage and networking into a modest footprint. It includes Active System Manager, which facilitates single pane management of both physical and virtual assets.</p>
<P>

<P>
Dell is also offering two reference architectures that add additional features to the Active System 800 configuration. One supports NVIDIA's GRID and targets users whose virtualized graphics needs are particularly demanding, and the other includes a local storage option that Dell says will drive down costs by eliminating the need for SAN.</p>]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[
<P>
Two very large clouds have been hanging over Dell for most of the year: the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/desktop/pc-market-bleeds-windows-8-tablet-fix-ne/240152706 ">flailing PC market</a>, and CEO Michael Dell's ongoing <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/desktop/dell-earnings-may-disappoint/240154986">attempt to take the company private</a>. Despite these distractions, Dell itself has spent 2013 doing exactly <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/desktop/michael-dell-our-transformation-is-compl/240144292">what it did at the end of 2012</a>: launching new enterprise products and declaring that its transition from PC maker to end-to-end solution provider has concluded.</p>
 
<P>

That trend continued Wednesday at the Citrix Synergy conference in Anaheim, where Dell <a href="http://en.community.dell.com/dell-blogs/direct2dell/b/direct2dell/archive/2013/05/22/dell-supports-citrix-xendesktop-7.aspx">announced a range of cloud computing products for Citrix-based environments</a>, including options that support Citrix XenDesktop 7, also unveiled on Wednesday. Dell hopes the moves will diversify its revenue streams, which are currently reliant on its low-margin PC business.</p>
<P>

<P>
The announcements include a version of Dell's Active System 800 converged infrastructure line optimized for Citrix XenDesktop. The product is a pre-integrated system that fits server, storage and networking into a modest footprint. It includes Active System Manager, which facilitates single pane management of both physical and virtual assets.</p>
<P>

<P>
Dell is also offering two reference architectures that add additional features to the Active System 800 configuration. One supports NVIDIA's GRID and targets users whose virtualized graphics needs are particularly demanding, and the other includes a local storage option that Dell says will drive down costs by eliminating the need for SAN.</p>]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/dell-launches-new-cloud-products-for-cit/3424?wc=4</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/dell-launches-new-cloud-products-for-cit/3424?wc=4</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/quickview/virtualization?wc=4</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
            			<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Servers & Storage]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Storage & Mgmt]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:55 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Google's Wireless Sensors: Big Data or Big Brother?]]></title>
                        <description><![CDATA[Google demonstrated a network of wireless environmental sensors at its I/O conference last week. These sensors, combined with projects like Google Glass, expose the potential for the use and misuse of relentless data collection.]]></description>
	            <blurb><![CDATA[Google demonstrated a network of wireless environmental sensors at its I/O conference last week. These sensors, combined with projects like Google Glass, expose the potential for the use and misuse of relentless data collection.]]></blurb>
            <link>http://www.networkcomputing.com/wireless/googles-wireless-sensors-big-data-or-big/240155347</link>
            <guid>http://www.networkcomputing.com/wireless/googles-wireless-sensors-big-data-or-big/240155347</guid>
            <category_url>http://www.networkcomputing.com/wireless</category_url>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fogarty]]></dc:creator>
                        
						<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Next Gen Network]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[Networking & Mgmt]]></category>
									<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Google Glass]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Google I/O]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ Data Sensing Lab]]></category>
						<category><![CDATA[ privacy]]></category>
			            <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:32 EDT</pubDate>
        </item>
		    </channel>
</rss> 
