Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Tom Trainer
Tom Trainer Network Computing Blogger

NAS Options for Public and Private Clouds

Public and private clouds can present challenges for file-based applications that use NAS. Here's how several vendors are helping companies meet those challenges.

As companies investigate cloud services, vendors are finding ways to make those companies' NAS infrastructures work with both public and private clouds.

On the public cloud front, one roadblock is that file-based applications running on NAS have to be rewritten to use object storage, which is the common storage mechanism used in public cloud services. Application rewrites can be time-consuming and costly. Even with a lower cost of compute factored in to cloud computing, adoption is stymied when there is cost and excessive lead time to deploy applications.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Vendors such as OrangeFS, TurnKey Linux and Red Hat are targeting potential customers of Amazon Web Services (AWS) by providing file systems that don't require application rewrites. For instance, OrangeFS provides a high performance computing (HPC) file system tuned for rapid access of data. This is typically deployed for uses such as engineer modeling applications, biosciences testing, and weather modeling.

TurnKey lets you deploy NAS quickly in AWS, though it doesn't offer features such as snapshots and remote replication. Red Hat Storage Server lets you deploy NAS in AWS and provides local synchronous replication across Availability Zones and asynchronous replication across regions (regions are separate geographical areas, such as the East and West coasts). This capability enables both business continuity if a zone fails and disaster recovery should an AWS region fail.

Red Hat Storage Server doesn't support snapshots, though the company says this feature is on its road map. Both TurnKey and Red Hat Storage Server are available in the AWS Market Place.

In the private cloud, OpenStack is emerging as an alternative to VMware-based private cloud infrastructure. The OpenStack framework enables you to choose your server virtualization and file and object storage providers. Two innovative companies on the storage side include Druva and SwiftStack.

Druva's InSynch product manages data storage across multiple nodes (data centers). Druva's InSych also provides data duplication with InSynch where only one copy of the data (such as documents and images) is kept for multiple nodes. Data dedupe can shorten backup times significantly. From a security perspective, InSynch uses 256-bit secure sockets layer (SSL) and stores data with 256-bit advanced encryption standard (AES) for data in transit.

Meanwhile, SwiftStack offers a software-based object storage system that serves content directly from storage without the need for additional hardware Web servers.

Additionally, Red Hat Enterprise Storage supports both file and object storage within the OpenStack framework. These storage and storage management vendors offer the use of commodity hardware and enable real cost saving for the enterprise.

Are you using the public cloud or deploying a private cloud? Have you had to rewrite applications to get file-based applications work with object storage? If so, what was your approach? You can share your experiences in the comments section.



Related Reading



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Buying power and influence are rapidly shifting to service providers. Where does that leave enterprise IT? Not at the cutting edge, thatís for sure: Only 19% are increasing both the number and capability of servers, budgets are level or down for 60% and just 12% are using new micro technology.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.