Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series

Commentary


Calculating The True Cost Of VDI

There are a lot of reasons to go with VDI, but economics isn’t one of them; VDI is too expensive to justify on costs alone. Here’s my tally.

In recent column, storage expert George Crump postulated that a VDI installation for an organization with 250 users could be done for less than $150 per desktop--not including whatever the user actually uses for hardware connecting to the VDI backend. I'd been doing some research on the subject, and was astonished at the $150-per-user price.

The problem, according to the story, is that storage is the bottleneck. More precisely, the bottleneck is storage bandwidth, not capacity. The assessment isn't all that surprising coming from a storage expert--when what you sell are hammers, every problem will call mostly for nails.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Before I get into offering my own price analysis, let me say that I agree with a number of points of George's article. First, DRAM is really important. If you want to see storage bandwidth become the bottleneck, just oversubscribe the server RAM, and--voila--you've got a storage bandwidth problem. Second, George says early on that the economics of VDI is a challenge. I agree with that, too. There are a lot of reasons to consider VDI or some other means of hosting apps that typically run on the desktop, but economics alone is not a good enough reason; the numbers just don't support it.

The first question you might ask is, $150 per desktop for what? We know the systems sitting on the end users' desks aren't part of that number, but certainly all the back-end software and hardware are, right? Probably not. The simplest way to purchase VDI is Citrix's VDI-in-a-Box product. It comes in 10 packs, with a list price of $1,950, which includes the first year of support. That's $160 for the license and $35 per year for the support. So much for a $150-per-desktop system. The VDI software will cost more than that.

Assuming you want to run Windows 7 Pro, you can tack on another $150 per user. And, no, you can't count the licenses you may have purchased with workstations. Microsoft will not allow you to transfer them or use them simultaneously. If the Redmond Mob audits you--and they're aggressive about doing so--you'll end up with a big fat bill for software.

You can already see why the economics of VDI are a tough sell. Assuming about $200 for the terminal devices on the users' desktops, we're already up to $545 in the first year, and we haven't even gotten ourselves any servers yet.

In terms of sizing servers, CPU performance is probably not going to be the limiting factor. If you bring up the Microsoft Task Manager on your own system, you'll see that CPU use rarely pops over about 20%. Accepting that at face value, you can figure five users per core, so a server with 16 cores should accommodate 80 users or so--provided you have enough memory. A typical Windows 7 desktop computer will come with 6GB to 8GB of DRAM. Mine has 6GB. I'm running Outlook, Firefox, Word and PowerPoint, and Task Manager tells me that 42% of my memory is in use.

[ Join us at Interop Las Vegas for access to 125+ IT sessions and 300+ exhibiting companies. Register today! ]

So, let's say we can get away with giving each user 4GB in a virtual machine on our VDI server. If we stick with the 80 users and don't oversubscribe the server's memory, we're looking at 320GB. That's a pretty hefty server. If we drop the memory allocation by half, we'll have a cheaper server, but we'll also ensure that we will be exercising that storage system and probably ensure that our users will notice pokey response.

The price on that four-socket, 320GB server will be about $20,000 or about $250 per user without any redundancy. If your philosophy leads you to N+1 configurations, you'd need four servers for 250 users or $320 per user.

Now the storage system. Obviously, there will a lot of duplicated files in a 250-user system. So, clearly, you don't need 120GB per user. Let's put the number at 20GB per user. That's a 5TB system you'll need, with some room to grow, so let's put the raw capacity at 10TB. Such a system will run you about $15,000, or another $60 per user for a system with limited performance and about double that for one with good performance.

Totaling it all up, we're looking at $380 to $440 for hardware costs, $345 for software and $200 for something on the user's desk. In round numbers, it totals $900 to $1,000, or about what it costs for a very nice desktop or a pretty good laptop.

The bottom line is you can justify VDI for a number of reasons--easier support, better security, perhaps better availability or a more appropriate system for task workers--but you can't justify it on hardware and software savings. The numbers won't work. If you have a large turnover in workers, or the need to frequently reconfigure desktops, or you have many remote workers, or you want to use VDI as part of a BYOD plan, then by all means take a close look. But do your homework on costs--they'll add up.



Related Reading



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Buying power and influence are rapidly shifting to service providers. Where does that leave enterprise IT? Not at the cutting edge, thatís for sure: Only 19% are increasing both the number and capability of servers, budgets are level or down for 60% and just 12% are using new micro technology.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.