Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series


WLAN Market Grew 10 Percent In Q3, Report Says

Third-quarter sales are just the beginning of what will be a five-year upgrade cycle to 802.11ac while new players disrupt the market, research firm predicts.

Sales for wireless local area network (WLAN) vendors grew at a modest 10% in the third quarter of 2013 versus the third quarter of 2012, but new 802.11ac products are expected to spur more growth, according to an industry research report.

Meanwhile, the numbers released Monday by Dell’Oro Group, a research firm focused exclusively on networking, show continued disruption by newer WLAN players.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Dell’Oro notes that the third quarter was the first full quarter of 802.11ac shipments, the next-generation technology succeeding the 802.11n standard for enterprise and outdoor WLANs.

“When you have a new product entering the market, typically there is pent-up demand for the device,” Chris DePuy, vice president of wireless LAN research at Dell’Oro, said in an interview. “This is the beginning of what we expect to be a five-year upgrade cycle to this new higher speed feature.”

In other words, networking equipment buyers are just like consumers who wait until the next Apple iPhone comes out and rush out to buy the new model. DePuy expects that the WLAN market will finish 2013 with a revenue growth rate “in the low teens.”

He said 802.11ac equipment is expected to sell well given that it enables use of the 5 GHz spectrum, which offers seven times more spectrum than from the 802.11n standard. The 802.11ac equipment shipping now is called “Wave 1” of the new standard. “Wave 2” 802.11ac will begin shipping in the next year or two.

Wave 2 differs from Wave 1, DePuy said, because it adds multi-user multiple-input-multiple-output (MU-MIMO) technology. MU-MIMO allows the WLAN system to share frequency such that multiple endpoint devices -- smartphones, tablets and the like -- can share the same frequency and deliver throughputs as great as three times faster than what’s available with Wave 1, he said.

[Read how a wireless site survey tool can help organizations navigate the transition to the new Wi-Fi standard in "Fluke Networks Updates AirMagnet Survey for 802.11ac."]

The Dell’Oro numbers also illustrate the continuing evolution of the competitive landscape in networking as market leader Cisco continues to face pressure from newer companies such as Ubiquiti Networks.

Dell’Oro identified Cisco, Ubiquiti and Ruckus Wireless, all based in the Silicon Valley, as the fastest growing WLAN vendors in the third quarter. Ubiquiti, described by Dell’Oro as a “relative newcomer,” has recently experienced “explosive growth,” DePuy said.

According to financial results released Nov. 8, the publicly-traded Ubiquiti posted net income of $40 million on revenue just shy of $130 million for the first nine months of 2013, versus net income of just $13 million on revenue of $61.5 million in the same period of 2012.

Ubiquiti’s business model is unique, DePuy said. Founded in 2003, it began by selling WLAN equipment deployed by wireless Internet service providers (ISPs) in rural areas. More recently, Ubiquiti entered the enterprise WLAN market competing against such established vendors as Cisco, HP, Aruba, Ruckus and others.

Ubiquiti has been a disruptor in the market with its go-to-market strategy, he added. Cisco, Aruba and others use value-added resellers (VARs) and distributors, but Ubiquiti does not have a sales force. Instead, it works through resellers that historically have been associated with service providers to build out their wireless ISP networks.

Figuring out exactly who’s buying these [Ubiquiti] products is a challenge,” DePuy said. “Tracking where those products go is difficult for the company and for its competitors to figure that out.” He surmises, though, that Ubiquiti is selling a lot into the small-to-medium business (SMB) market.

Ubiquiti did not respond to a request for comment, but its CEO, Robert Pera, explained his business model in a June 17 blog post.

Because a company like Cisco is so big, the selling process involves a crowd of sales, marketing, multi-tiered distribution channels, system integrators, and other players, he wrote: “Whether they know it or not, customers have been largely paying for a set of ‘relationships’ that have nothing to do with technology value of the product they are paying money for. They are essentially getting ripped off."



Related Reading



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Buying power and influence are rapidly shifting to service providers. Where does that leave enterprise IT? Not at the cutting edge, thatís for sure: Only 19% are increasing both the number and capability of servers, budgets are level or down for 60% and just 12% are using new micro technology.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.