Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series


The Case For More Granular Network QoS

Vendor-supplied settings for network quality of service won't cut it when prioritizing critical apps, VoIP and video traffic. Invest in developing a network QoS strategy.

Network quality of service is a strategy that strives for consistent and predictable performance for the various types of traffic traversing the network. From both business and IT perspectives, the desire is to deliver consistent application and communications performance over the network.

Network administrators implement QoS by setting priorities for video, audio and data traffic on the network. However, as more companies move to video and VoIP, broad-based QoS settings may not be comprehensive or granular enough to meet business or customer needs.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

“Most enterprises either don’t do QoS or they do it, but only to the bare minimum,” says Deb Smith, an industry consultant. “Instead, they just trust the presets for QoS on their network devices to do the work.”

Smith noted that if all you need to do in your company is prioritize VoIP over other traffic, sticking with vendor defaults on network equipment for QoS might be enough. Unfortunately, most companies today must also prioritize video, critical applications and content downloads--and they must do this at the same time they assess traffic usage patterns so that they continue to optimize their networks for all of the traffic traversing them.

“You’re at risk if you simply trust what your network hardware vendors have established as defaults for QoS on their equipment,” says Smith. “This is when it becomes vital for IT itself to classify and to prioritize network traffic throughput for critical applications and also for services such as VoIP.”

Obstacles To Network QoS

So if a network QoS strategy is so important, why aren’t more companies doing it? There are several reasons, including time constraints. Network administrators and technicians already have full task lists. A full-blown QoS study, followed by policy development and implementation, is a non-trivial undertaking, so it’s easy to sit back and let the network vendor equipment defaults do the QoS work.

Another reason is that many network administrators and technicians lack the QoS skills (and methodology) needed to develop a network QoS that specifically fits the profile of applications and services their corporate networks run.

“There can be real disconnects, especially with the voice side of the staff, since they are used to having their own environment for telephony and not having to share resources on a network that also carries other services,” says Smith.

In addition, many network professionals focus their duties on the overall technical performance of their networks, and not necessarily on business priorities for each application and service running over the network. In short, if the network is performing at an overall acceptable level, the network administrator considers network SLAs as “met.”

[Read how a health care provider monitors quality of service on its network to ensure high-quality telemedicine, video and telephony service for patients in rural areas in "QoS Boosts Health Of Telemedicine Network."]

In a more granularly defined QoS model, however, corporate communication requirements are broken down by traffic types within the network and then translated into predictable and repeatable performance results that the business can understand.

For example, if you are a healthcare agency providing telemedicine services, you might set an SLA that only so many telephone calls can be placed when telemedicine applications are in use. SLAs that can translate network QoS into common business outcomes are useful in budgeting sessions because they give IT business justification when it fights for greater bandwidth within the context of services the business needs.

Developing A Network QoS Strategy

Of course, defining an internal network QoS that goes beyond vendor presets to address the needs of the business can be a daunting task.

“It’s a step-by-step process,” says Smith. “First, companies need to look at their network needs and make sure that all equipment is upgraded to the latest levels of software and firmware. They also need to look at the various types of traffic the network is carrying and then break this traffic into categories, such as voice, video and various critical applications.”

Once this categorization is done, IT should meet with business stakeholders to gain consensus over how services and applications should be prioritized, and what the expected SLA levels--expressed in business terms-- should be for each.

“It takes time and money to develop an internal network QoS, but, like anything else, network QoS is an investment,” says Smith.

It’s also likely to become a greater corporate priority as network performance assumes a larger role in the performance of enterprise applications and services.

[Get deep insight into how to structure QoS in a Cisco environment that runs converged voice, video and data in Ethan Banks' workshop "How To Set Up Network QoS for Voice, Video & Data" at Interop New York Sept. 30-Oct. 4. Register today!]



Related Reading



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Buying power and influence are rapidly shifting to service providers. Where does that leave enterprise IT? Not at the cutting edge, thatís for sure: Only 19% are increasing both the number and capability of servers, budgets are level or down for 60% and just 12% are using new micro technology.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.