Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series


OpenDaylight Panel: Fewer SDN Standards, Easier Adoption

Experts addressed software-defined networking issues at the inaugural OpenDaylight Summit.

A panel discussion this week in Santa Clara, Calif. highlighted some of the many issues surrounding software-defined networking, including whether standards are needed and how to accelerate SDN adoption.

The panel was held at the inaugural OpenDaylight Summit, which attracted nearly 600 attendees and featured the release of the OpenDaylight Project's first open source SDN code, Hydrogen.

Dan Pitt, executive director of the Open Networking Foundation, which works to promote SDN and OpenFlow technologies, said organizational inertia is impeding SDN adoption. ONF is trying to ease the migration to SDN by enabling coexistence with a lot of existing enterprise technology investments and building training opportunities, Pitt said.

Guru Parulkar, chairman of the Open Networking Summit and a leader in developing OpenFlow, called SDN is "a disruptive innovation," but doesn't see anything holding it back. "It will go through its own technology cycle... It's going through a natural adoption model," he said.

On the topic of standards, Pitt said the ONF tries to standardize as little as possible. "The key is to enable those who operate networks to build best-of-breed pieces," he said.

The main goal of the ONF, he added, is to help SDN succeed, not to push standards.

[Read why Tom Hollingsworth thinks we need a new term for software-defined networking that has strict requirements before vendors can label their products with it in "Is It Time for SDN 2.0?"]

Parulkar also said SDN standardization generally should be avoided. Any standards should be based on experience with the technology and finding what APIs work best, he said.

Nick Lippis, co-founder and vice chairman of the Open Networking User Group, said he sees a role for both standards and open source with SDN, but believes the open source pieces will be more important. "In the enterprise, there's a dire need for a software ecosystem," he said.

Standards aside, SDN is much needed, panelists said. "The market is looking for capex and opex relief," Lippis said, adding that one network engineer may manage 120 devices. "There's huge bloat in terms of operational cost to run enterprise networks," he said.

Network management needs to be streamlined and automated in order for trends such as big data to take off, Lippis said.

Today, network operators depend too much on vendors, but with SDN, operators are taking more control, Parulkar said. "Now the pendulum is swinging back."



Related Reading


More Insights



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Buying power and influence are rapidly shifting to service providers. Where does that leave enterprise IT? Not at the cutting edge, thatís for sure: Only 19% are increasing both the number and capability of servers, budgets are level or down for 60% and just 12% are using new micro technology.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.