Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series


Extreme Networks Gets EMC VSPEX Validation

EMC partnership follows reseller deal with Lenovo; IBM releases entry-level mainframe; Solera integrates with BlueCoat; FrontRange adds IT service management features.

Extreme Networks is ramping up its efforts to expand into the converged data center by partnering with EMC. The company’s Open Fabric Ethernet switches are now validated for VSPEX, EMC’s architecture geared toward virtualized and cloud environments. Extreme’s switches support OpenStack and include its Summit X670 10 Gigabit Ethernet switch.

The VSPEX validation places Extreme in the company of major vendors such as IBM, VMware, Dell and Cisco, and is a positive step for the company, said Bob Laliberte, senior analyst at Enterprise Strategy Group, because it gives it the opportunity to play in what ESG describes as the integrated computing platform (ICP) ecosystem. The validation could help drive incremental revenues for Extreme, he said. Combined with its recently announced reseller deal with Lenovo, “it’s a big foot in the ICP door," he added.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

ESG defines ICP as virtual computing infrastructure that integrates hardware and software into a single consumable IT system, combining normally independent pieces of infrastructure to create simplified computing platforms targeted for virtualized and cloud environments.

However, VSPEX validation is only a start, added Laliberte. Extreme is known as a player in the high-performance computing space and has expanded its offerings to include cloud and software defined networking. But the VSPEX program already leverages technology from Cisco and Brocade, so Extreme needs to educate the VSPEX channel and EMC sales teams on the value of its gear.

EMC’s VSPEX currently has 19 reference architectures designed for small and midmarket organizations, said Mark Bowker, senior analyst at ESG. VSPEX products are available globally, but only through EMC Velocity Global Alliance Partners. EMC designs and tests VSPEX products, while system integrators and VARs select the appropriate configuration based on customer needs, preferences, and environment.

Currently, VCE’s vBlock, NetApp’s FlexPod -- which includes Cisco’s Unified Computing System in the stack -- and HP VirtualSystem are considered ICP leaders, he said, while emerging companies worth watching are SimpliVity, Nutanix and Scale.

ESG research shows ICPs will become the consumption model for many new greenfield software deployments, said Bowker, including VDI, which requires complex infrastructure deployed in a simplified manner. “Enterprises are not racing to consume and procure everything they do with an ICP solution, but they are certainly including it as part of their research and due diligence," he said.

IBM’s Newest Big Iron

Big Blue continues to invest in its mainframe portfolio with the release of the zEnterprise BC12, an entry-level system starting at $75,000 with a 4.2 GHz processor, which IBM says is faster than its predecessor, the z114, and has twice the available memory.

The zBC12 comes with software tools to support analytics, cloud and mobile computing capabilities. For analytics, IBM’s new zEnterprise Analytics System 9710 includes DB2 10 for z/OS VUE and can be combined with its DB2 Analytics Accelerator for faster response times for analytics workloads. IBM has also beefed up support for cloud computing with its OMEGAMON for z/OS family to better detect performance issues.

In addition, IBM announced a new Linux-only based version of the zBC12; the Enterprise Linux Server (ELS) includes hardware, a z/VM Hypervisor and three years of maintenance. The ELS can run more than 3,000 Linux apps, and supports analytics and cloud computing using the new ELS for Analytics and Cloud-Ready for Linux on System z.

[Demand for supercomputing is on the rise as companies need more powerful systems for big data analytics. Read more in "Does Your Data Center Need A Supercomputer?"]

IBM has seen competition from challengers in computing markets it has traditionally dominated, and recently lost a $600 million contract with the CIA to Amazon Web Services. Until recently, x86 systems could not compete with the reliability of the mainframe without the abstraction of a virtualized stack, Jasmine McTigue wrote in Information Week's report on the Future of The Mainframe, but now they are a viable competitor, pushing IBM to invest R&D dollars into refreshing its flagship System z line last year.

According to InformationWeek's 2012 State of the Data Center survey, 27% of 534 respondents have IBM zSeries architectures in use and plan to retain them, while an additional 5% are using the systems but plan to retire them.

With the zBC12, IBM is responding to the competition from x86 systems. The company claims a single zBC12 can save clients up to 55% compared with the cost of x86 distributed environments. The zBC12 can consolidate up to 40 virtual servers per core, or up to 520 in a single footprint, starting at $1 per day, per virtual server.

NEXT: New Release From Solera and FrontRange

 1 | 2  | Next Page »


Related Reading



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Buying power and influence are rapidly shifting to service providers. Where does that leave enterprise IT? Not at the cutting edge, thatís for sure: Only 19% are increasing both the number and capability of servers, budgets are level or down for 60% and just 12% are using new micro technology.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.