Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Kurt Marko
Kurt Marko Contributing Editor

IT Vendors Need More Pricing Transparency

Compiling our SDN product comparison provided a vivid lesson in the difficulty of getting meaningful prices for enterprise IT equipment.

I recently assembled Network Computing's SDN vendor comparison, a buyer's guide on software-defined networking hardware and software. A key component of any buyer's guide is pricing, because it affects everything from the perceived value of a specific feature set to a buyer's ROI calculus. It's hard to compare products when the bottom line is a black hole, but that's the situation we ran into with a number of vendors as we reviewed their submissions to our guide.

Finding enterprise IT equipment prices has never been as easy as looking up products on Google or Amazon, but there's no reason it has to be so complicated.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

A favorite vendor tactic is the "starting at" number. One SDN software vendor initially provided only the vaguest guidance about a subscription model starting at almost $10,000 per month, with no indication of how the product is licensed--whether by number of nodes and/or feature bundles--or what's included in the base price. Even car companies put the entry-level model number and features on a window sticker.

When we pressed this vendor, we finally managed to pry out the fact that licensing fees are based on the number of controlled switches and that the starting price was actually a fraction of its initial quote, running about $25 per switch per month.

Another vendor, whose submission was not published due to an utter lack of specificity, said it prices its product case by case, with customers required to contact the company for a customized estimate. This implies to me that they haven't really figured out a pricing model and are essentially making it up as they go.

Perhaps this is understandable for a startup, or a company rolling out a new product, but it's equally understandable why an IT manager wouldn't want to do business under these conditions. Evaluating and pricing IT hardware and software shouldn't be more tedious and less transparent than getting a quote from a contractor on redoing your kitchen.

Indeed, the worst offenders are software products; switch vendors, admittedly a far more mature and competitive market, were forthright about providing model numbers, port counts and list prices.

In the vendors' defense, one factor behind their hesitance to share pricing details is the immaturity of the SDN market in general and their product offerings in particular. Many SDN hopefuls appear to be rushing product announcements and pre-production demos to get ahead of competitors in the great SDN gold rush for mindshare and industry buzz.

Several said they hadn't yet set price figures, but would do so later this quarter. We plan to hold them to this commitment, because without firm numbers, the products look like vaporware. Any product without prices, model numbers and detailed specs should be viewed with a healthy dose of skepticism.

Our experience with the SDN guide is in stark contrast to an earlier cloud computing (IaaS) product comparison, in which vendors provided enough pricing detail for customers to make accurate estimates of their monthly bills for a given compute workload and pool of storage capacity.

This illustrates a vast difference in business practices and pricing transparency between traditional, big-ticket IT infrastructure of enterprise hardware and software--which is typically purchased on multiyear refresh cycles--and the new generation of pay-as-you-go cloud services, which can be procured in an afternoon, upgraded as often as needed and turned off at the customer's convenience.

The sense of entitlement bordering on arrogance of some enterprise IT suppliers, as illustrated by VMware President and COO Carl Eschenbach's reference to Amazon as a mere bookseller, is smashing head-on into a new generation of customer-focused competitors, many of which grew out of the consumer, not enterprise, market. They take no business for granted.

In our SDN comparison, Plexxi set an example of clarity and simplicity others would do well to emulate. The company provided us with this pricing information: "The Plexxi Affinity Topologies is included with Plexxi Control, which costs $5,000 per controlled switch. The switches are $64,000 for Switch 1 and $85,000 for Switch 1x, plus maintenance charges of 10% to 18% of purchase price." That isn't so hard, is it?



Related Reading



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Buying power and influence are rapidly shifting to service providers. Where does that leave enterprise IT? Not at the cutting edge, thatís for sure: Only 19% are increasing both the number and capability of servers, budgets are level or down for 60% and just 12% are using new micro technology.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.