Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Andrew Conry Murray
Andrew Conry Murray

Google's Green Energy Scheme: Laudable or Laughable?

A Google initiative to pay more for renewable energy at its data center in Lenoir, N.C., spurred a variety of reactions from readers. Some saw it as a step forward for green energy; others call it plain dumb.

Last week, Google announced a program in North Carolina that would allow businesses to voluntarily pay utilities more money for power that comes from renewable energy sources.

My InformationWeek colleague Tom Claburn wrote "In keeping with previous commitments to support renewable energy, Google announced that Duke Energy, which supplies power to Google's Lenoir, N.C., data center, has agreed to implement a program to help large companies like Google buy renewable power."

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Data centers are notorious consumers of power, so Google's move looks like a commitment to making the information technology industry a little more green by getting power from renewable sources such as wind and solar--and it seems the search giant is willing to pay to make it happen.

Of course, folks tend to have strong opinions about green energy (and electrical utilities), so I asked readers of our Network Computing newsletter what they made of this initiative. The responses ranged from applause to skepticism to outright condemnation.

For instance, Michael Y wrote, "...a friend from Denmark told me when you sign up with the electric company, consumers can choose the source of your power--wind, solar, water, etc. You pay different rates depending on the source. When people sign up for alternate sources, the power companies are then required to invest more in that technology to meet the demand. It struck me as incredibly democratic and progressive."

Other respondents liked the idea of getting power from renewable sources, but wondered whether Google's approach would actually spur more investment in renewables.

James wrote, "If Duke Power is anything like our local power company, the Google investment will likely end up in the pockets of shareholders instead of in green power development. While Google's is a laudable goal, I think they would be better served to invest directly in green power instead of through a power utility."

Stu Gordon, Sr. P.M. noted, "Paying higher amounts for power from renewable sources is wrong. The right way is to improve the mechanics of renewable energy and make it competitive. Please realize that electricity from renewable sources is still high, even after receiving all the government subsidies. Google is another organization telling us what to do, because they know better than the rest of us. I have a suggestion for Google: pay taxes like the rest of us before you tell us what to think or do."

Rolf Sperber doubts Google's gesture will have a significant impact: "Google built its data centers in North Carolina because dirty energy was and is cheap there. So I guess they are just trying not to look evil. I doubt that companies that have energy-intensive production would pay more for clean energy; just look at services being moved from Germany to Poland to Romania and finally to India or Bangladesh. It's only profit that counts, and as long as no one has to take external effects into account, there will be no change in production paradigms."

Lastly, one respondent scoffed at the notion of paying more for green energy, and called it a waste of money.

"I have to throw the BS flag on anything like this. I have a friend who is a retired federal government power administrator. He says the following:

• The grid is the grid. There is no way to send green power to one point on the grid and other power to another point.

• The sun doesn't shine all the time, and the wind doesn't blow all the time. You still need at least 85% of capacity load available from something other than renewable power.

Anyone who is willing to pay more for "clean" or "green" power is something other than intelligent or thinking. Unless you are off the grid and creating your own "clean" power or have a direct line to someone who is, you get the mixture of what is on the grid. If you create your own, then you must consider that the sun doesn't shine all the time and the wind doesn't blow all the time, so what do you do then? Turn on your diesel generators? Those are clean, aren't they?

Here in Colorado, Excel Energy will allow you to buy "clean renewable energy" at a premium. Sounds like a revenue enhancement to them and a "feel good" waste of money to those who want to.

You can weigh in using our comments section below.



Related Reading



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Buying power and influence are rapidly shifting to service providers. Where does that leave enterprise IT? Not at the cutting edge, thatís for sure: Only 19% are increasing both the number and capability of servers, budgets are level or down for 60% and just 12% are using new micro technology.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.