Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series


Cisco Skips VMware's NSX Coming-Out Party

Networking giant Cisco Systems was noticeably absent in the list of partners VMware says are working on NSX integrations.

At the official launch of NSX at VMworld, executives at the virtualization company touted the company's partnerships with 20 networking, security and other vendors. HP, Dell, Brocade, Arista and Juniper Networks were among those that unveiled technologies that integrate with NSX at the conference.

Cisco Systems was a notable exception from the NSX partner hoopla. Asked about VMware's relationship with the networking giant during a press Q&A Tuesday, VMware CEO Pat Gelsinger said, "We'll do everything in our power to build the partnership we have with Cisco."

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

"NSX will be a great platform for Cisco infrastructure," he added.

Gelsinger emphasized that NSX is in its early days, comparing it to VMware's server virtualization software. "This is like ESX in 2004. We're just beginning to mine a rich vein of innovation that we think has a decade ahead of us."

During a session on network virtualization and NSX Wednesday at VMworld, an attendee asked Allwyn Sequeira, VP and CTO of networking and security at VMware, about integration with Cisco.

"Obviously, you have to work with Cisco. Our customers demand that," Sequeira said, but added that he would leave any official statements to Cisco.

Cisco declined to comment directly to Network Computing, but on Thursday CTO Padmasree Warrior posted a blog. Cisco's stance on NSX was made clear in the blog's headline: "Limitations of a Software-Only Approach to Data Center Networking."

Warrior emphasized Cisco's ongoing relationship with VMware, writing "VMware is an important partner to Cisco, and we expect to continue our close collaboration around private cloud and desktop virtualization."

However, she also declared that a software-only approach puts a restriction on customers. "It doesn't scale, and it fails to provide full real-time visibility of both physical and virtual infrastructure," she wrote. "In addition this approach does not provide key capabilities such as multi-hypervisor support, integrated security, systems point-of-view or end-to-end telemetry for application placement and troubleshooting."

[Martin Casado, VMware's chief architect for networking, addresses critiques of NSX and discusses other issues in a Network Computing interview. Check out "VMware's Martin Casado: Energy and Chaos."]

She also wrote that customers would be forced to tie together components from other vendors, which would add "...cost and complexity in both day-to-day operations as well as throughout the network lifecycle."

Cisco wasn't without a presence at VMworld. It has a prominent booth on the show floor, showing off its Nexus switches, integration between Unified Communication System (UCS) and VMware, and cloud management tools.

"As is said on Facebook, it's complicated," said Eric Hanselman, chief analyst at 451 Research, in regard to the Cisco/VMware relationship.

"There is certainly a long-term impact that network virtualization could have on making it easier for customers to bring other networking vendors into their worlds," said Hanselman. "At over 80% market share, though, VMware and any other players will be working with Cisco for a long time to come. Much of Cisco's UCS business is driven by VMware sales, so the dependencies are not one-sided."

Joshua McKenty, co-founder and CTO of startup Piston Cloud Computing--which makes a public cloud operating system based on OpenStack--said Cisco will go its own route on software-defined networking. "They don't need NSX," he said in an interview on the show floor. Piston partners with both Cisco and VMware.

"With its massive installed base, they can be more strategic," McKenty said. "They can take a wait-and-see approach. They know when they need to throw money in, they can."

"Clearly, VMware and Cisco are going head to head," Michael Bushong, VP of marketing at Plexxi, which makes an SDN controller, said in an interview on the show floor. "They have philosophically different points of view."

At Cisco Live earlier this summer, Cisco provided more details about its SDN plans by unveiling Dynamic Fabric Automation. Cisco calls its SDN strategy "Application-Centric Infrastructure."

Many in the industry assume Insieme, a Cisco-backed venture, is doing something related to SDN, but Cisco has yet to provide significant details about it.

For its part, HP is working with VMware to federate its Virtual Application Networks SDN Controller with NSX, Bethany Mayer, senior VP and general manager of HP Networking, said in an interview at VMworld.

As an overlay technology, NSX doesn't provide visibility to the network beneath it, she said. The federated HP-VMware technology, slated for the second half of 2014, will provide a centralized view of the network and facilitate automation, she added.

Worried about how SDN might affect your career in networking? Want insights on how to stay relevant as virtualization upends the data center network? Don't miss the panel discussion and Q&A session "Will SDN Make Me Homeless?" at Interop New York this October.



Related Reading



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

2013 SDN Survey: Growing Pains

2013 SDN Survey: Growing Pains

In this report, we'll look at the state of Software-defined networking in the marketplace and examine the survey results. We'll also outline what a typical SDN infrastructure looks like in 2013, including a controller, programmable infrastructure, applications and network multitenancy. We'll dig into both OpenDaylight and OpenFlow, two open source initiatives that are shaping SDN from outside. Finally, We'll offer guidance for network professionals on how to approach bringing SDN into their own environments.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.