Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Lee H. Badman
Lee H. Badman Network Computing Blogger

Cisco Announces Meraki Cloud-Managed Network Service

Cisco has introduced the Cisco Meraki Managed Services Dashboard, which lets managed service providers run their customers' WLANs and wired networks.

Cisco is announcing a new managed service offering built on the Meraki product line that it acquired last year. The Cisco Meraki Managed Services Dashboard is a new option for those shopping for a Meraki system because now you can have a provider run your network environment for you via the cloud.

Managed service providers (MSP) can market the complete Meraki suite as an outsourced service to their customers. Providers use the dashboard to isolate customer accounts while providing personalized services. The offering manages both WLANs and wired networks, and includes simple WLAN services at small sites as well as complex, multisite interconnectivity with switching, security, WLAN, application control and MDM.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

With the new services, customers go to their MSP for support. In turn, the MSP can tap Cisco for issues the MSP can’t solve itself. Whether this model is a success depends on a few factors, including the quality of individual MSPs and whether Cisco prices the service fairly without bloating the license costs.

There’s not much new here for Meraki customers who run their own environments, but those looking for new networking options will want to take note. Meanwhile, competitors such as Aerohive and PowerCloud will no doubt see Cisco's latest move as further validation of their own models.

As a customer of both Meraki and Cisco, I was worried that the acquisition might wreck some of the things I liked about Meraki. For example, Meraki makes a point of quick turnaround of feature requests from customers with its nifty Make a Wish tool. Cisco expects customers to funnel similar requests via a black hole that relies on local SEs as gatekeepers to a very murky process.

Meraki also keeps its dashboard interfaces and options simple, effective and mostly intuitive. Cisco’s own Prime Infrastructure and controller interfaces frequently present what I will politely call “navigational challenges.”

The WLAN community is watching to see how long the better parts of Meraki will remain in place. So far, Cisco has been true to its word that it wouldn’t ruin a good thing; Meraki has largely maintained its operational look and feel in the months that Cisco has owned it.

But this outcome isn’t a given. Cisco may decide it can’t support two paradigms and eventually morph the nimble Meraki goodness into the more bureaucratic and bigger corporate feel of Cisco proper. In the meantime, I’ll appreciate my current Meraki network as long as its stays just the way it is.



Related Reading



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Research: 2014 State of Server Technology

Buying power and influence are rapidly shifting to service providers. Where does that leave enterprise IT? Not at the cutting edge, thatís for sure: Only 19% are increasing both the number and capability of servers, budgets are level or down for 60% and just 12% are using new micro technology.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.