Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Greg  Ferro

WAN Acceleration Slows Down

A new report shows the WAN acceleration/optimization market is shrinking. WAN optimization won't go away, but don't look for growth either.

A variety of forces are arrayed against the WAN acceleration/ optimization market, including falling bandwidth costs, new IT funding models, better-designed applications, and more. These forces won't kill the WAN acceleration market, but I believe they will keep it from growing.

A recent Infonetics report on ADCs and WAN optimization bears this out. The report stated "WAN optimization sales got a temporary bump in 2Q13, but the segment remains on an overall downward trajectory, declining 11% from 2Q12."

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Last year I wrote a report, The Next-Gen WAN (registration required), that drew from an InformationWeek survey of IT professionals. While 51% of respondents said they use WAN optimization on either most connections or a few key connections, I also stated "the value of this technology may fade in the years ahead." Here's why.

Bandwidth is Cheap

The easiest way to improve a WAN connection is to buy more bandwidth, and that option becomes more feasible as the price of WAN bandwidth continues to drop. But there are other factors that make bandwidth even cheaper.

The first is the slow but gradual growth of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI). In the last five years, VDI has moved from "sort of works" to "works well enough" to gain wider acceptance. Besides reducing bandwidth consumption, VDI has other values, including improved security and simpler desktop administration.

[Storage plays a key role in VDI. Find out how to put the latest storage advances to work for you in "Solving VDI Problems with SSDs and Data Deduplication."]

The second factor is the increasing use of Internet connections as primary bandwidth to replace traditional WAN services. VPN technology has traditionally been complex and hard to operate, but recent enhancements have made this choice more attractive. Internet connectivity is many times cheaper than WAN and readily available in any geography.

There is an interesting business condition here as bandwidth moves to Internet connections and consumes the majority of resources. As that trend continues, dedicated WAN costs will become more expensive. This will count against WAN optimization in the long term.

Capital and Operations

Companies are reluctant to invest large amounts of capital to reduce operating expenses. The current trend is to move IT charges into operating expenses. WAN acceleration is both capital intensive and operationally expensive due to its high purchase cost and ongoing support and maintenance costs (including the IT personnel to manage the product).

While many WAN optimization companies are providing virtual appliances to reduce costs, you still need to provision each remote location with at least a physical server, hypervisor and the virtual appliance.

These days, IT funding models aim to incur costs on a monthly or quarterly basis to match ROI; a technology deployment such as WAN optimization that requires a year or more to show ROI is likely a non-starter.

Some analysts and engineers believe WAN acceleration has a future in hybrid cloud applications, which could perhaps justify capital and operational expenses. But I think dynamic bursting between private and public clouds is an edge case at best, not a mass-market play. Hybrid cloud rarely survives a close technical inspection.

New Protocols and Applications

Another less visible trend is that software vendors are becoming conscious of network efficiency. Although a decade overdue, new protocols such as SPDY and Microsoft's SMB 3.0, as well as more efficient programming, are improving the network response times for applications. WAN acceleration has always been a workaround for poor technology, so any concerted to improve application efficiency makes the entire WAN optimization industry less relevant.

While the business case is against WAN acceleration, we won't see the end of this market in the next decade. Locations that have poor telecommunications infrastructure have specific needs that WAN acceleration can meet.

That said, overall it's hard to see that WAN acceleration will grow. It's time to focus on structural change in IT infrastructure and move past minor (but operationally expensive) tweaks to efficiency in the WAN.

[QoS can help make the best use of available bandwidth. Get a deep dive on how to take advantage of QoS at Interop New York in the workshop "How To Set Up Network QoS for Voice, Video & Data."] Click the link for details.



Related Reading



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

2013 SDN Survey: Growing Pains

2013 SDN Survey: Growing Pains

In this report, we'll look at the state of Software-defined networking in the marketplace and examine the survey results. We'll also outline what a typical SDN infrastructure looks like in 2013, including a controller, programmable infrastructure, applications and network multitenancy. We'll dig into both OpenDaylight and OpenFlow, two open source initiatives that are shaping SDN from outside. Finally, We'll offer guidance for network professionals on how to approach bringing SDN into their own environments.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.