Special Coverage Series

Network Computing

Special Coverage Series

Commentary

Greg  Ferro

VCE Chooses Cisco SDN Over VMware NSX

VCE, maker of integrated Vblock systems, will use Cisco's Application Centric Infrastructure for SDN. So what about customers who want NSX?

VCE, maker of Vblock integrated systems, has chosen Cisco’s Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) over VMware NSX for its Software-Defined Networking (SDN) strategy. The decision was outlined by Trey Layton, VCE’s VP and CTO. Customers may be confused and disappointed by this decision.

VCE is agglutination of VMware/Cisco/EMC products that sell to the premium end of the market. The VCE business model is basically the same as any other reseller—hardware leads professional services revenue. VCE sells a strictly limited number of products that it calls "best-in-class production ready technologies" where "best" means just one product in each category.

More Insights

Webcasts

More >>

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

VCE builds a profitable services business by rigidly restricting its product and vendor partnerships. This limited product selection means that internal technology, business and service skills run deep on the few products that are offered in the Vblock systems.

In keeping with this model, VCE will choose just one SDN networking technology—and that’s Cisco’s. Cisco is the networking partner in the VCE relationship and can make strong claim to setting the network strategy. It’s likely that Cisco holds a larger share in VCE than VMware, and may own the board seats to push ACI onto VCE.

[VMware NSX may upend networking. Greg Ferro offers details in “VMware NSX: Game Changer for Data Center Networks.”]

Selecting Cisco ACI for the networking component is a decisive move at an early stage. While Cisco has announced some elements of its SDN portfolio, the market is waiting to see what emerges from its Insieme effort, which will be officially announced in November.

This decision has ramifications for Vblock customers. Part of the VCE pitch is that its infrastructure is the best platform for VMware, so many customers will likely want to use VMware NSX for networking. Being forced into Cisco ACI may alienate customers.

VCE says customers can deploy VMware NSX onto a Vblock if they chose, but VCE won’t provide support for NSX. That defeats the whole purpose of a Vblock: the primary value of VCE is the "pig-to-bacon" professional services package.

While VCE’s SDN choice may sting some customers, it may not mean all that much to VMware, because VMware would get limited revenue from VCE. A "billion dollar annual run rate" suggests that sales were $250 million in the last quarter, and I’d guess the majority of that revenue would have been hardware, not VMware licenses. It’s doubtful that VCE is a significant-enough VMware partner to make the decision too painful.

Cisco has hinted that its SDN strategy will be hardware-centric by claiming that a software-only network doesn't scale. Hardware suits the VCE business because, as the company says, infrastructure matters. Specifically, hardware infrastructure is key to its business and this leads to the conclusion that Cisco's SDN solution suits the VCE revenue opportunity better.

So be it. VCE has an internal motto of "Game On." Well, it has placed its bets and customers have to go with Cisco or fall out of the supported configuration. VCE sets the rules of the game on its “approved” technology. If you want VMware NSX, then Vblocks should not be part of your game plan because it’s not a supported product.



Related Reading



Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Editor's Choice

2013 SDN Survey: Growing Pains

2013 SDN Survey: Growing Pains

In this report, we'll look at the state of Software-defined networking in the marketplace and examine the survey results. We'll also outline what a typical SDN infrastructure looks like in 2013, including a controller, programmable infrastructure, applications and network multitenancy. We'll dig into both OpenDaylight and OpenFlow, two open source initiatives that are shaping SDN from outside. Finally, We'll offer guidance for network professionals on how to approach bringing SDN into their own environments.
Get full survey results now! »

Vendor Turf Wars

Vendor Turf Wars

The enterprise tech market used to be an orderly place, where vendors had clearly defined markets. No more. Driven both by increasing complexity and Wall Street demands for growth, big vendors are duking it out for primacy -- and refusing to work together for IT's benefit. Must we now pick a side, or is neutrality an option?
Get the Digital Issue »

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps

WEBCAST: Software Defined Networking (SDN) First Steps


Software defined networking encompasses several emerging technologies that bring programmable interfaces to data center networks and promise to make networks more observable and automated, as well as better suited to the specific needs of large virtualized data centers. Attend this webcast to learn the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging.
Register Today »

Related Content

From Our Sponsor

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

How Data Center Infrastructure Management Software Improves Planning and Cuts Operational Cost

Business executives are challenging their IT staffs to convert data centers from cost centers into producers of business value. Data centers can make a significant impact to the bottom line by enabling the business to respond more quickly to market demands. This paper demonstrates, through a series of examples, how data center infrastructure management software tools can simplify operational processes, cut costs, and speed up information delivery.

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Impact of Hot and Cold Aisle Containment on Data Center Temperature and Efficiency

Both hot-air and cold-air containment can improve the predictability and efficiency of traditional data center cooling systems. While both approaches minimize the mixing of hot and cold air, there are practical differences in implementation and operation that have significant consequences on work environment conditions, PUE, and economizer mode hours. The choice of hot-aisle containment over cold-aisle containment can save 43% in annual cooling system energy cost, corresponding to a 15% reduction in annualized PUE. This paper examines both methodologies and highlights the reasons why hot-aisle containment emerges as the preferred best practice for new data centers.

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Monitoring Physical Threats in the Data Center

Traditional methodologies for monitoring the data center environment are no longer sufficient. With technologies such as blade servers driving up cooling demands and regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley driving up data security requirements, the physical environment in the data center must be watched more closely. While well understood protocols exist for monitoring physical devices such as UPS systems, computer room air conditioners, and fire suppression systems, there is a class of distributed monitoring points that is often ignored. This paper describes this class of threats, suggests approaches to deploying monitoring devices, and provides best practices in leveraging the collected data to reduce downtime.

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Cooling Strategies for Ultra-High Density Racks and Blade Servers

Rack power of 10 kW per rack or more can result from the deployment of high density information technology equipment such as blade servers. This creates difficult cooling challenges in a data center environment where the industry average rack power consumption is under 2 kW. Five strategies for deploying ultra-high power racks are described, covering practical solutions for both new and existing data centers.

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers

High density IT equipment stresses the power density capability of modern data centers. Installation and unmanaged proliferation of this equipment can lead to unexpected problems with power and cooling infrastructure including overheating, overloads, and loss of redundancy. The ability to measure and predict power and cooling capability at the rack enclosure level is required to ensure predictable performance and optimize use of the physical infrastructure resource. This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.