Networking

09:06 AM
Mark Melvin
Mark Melvin
Commentary
50%
50%

Can SDN Adoption Solve Real-World Problems?

If you think software-defined networking is all hype and no substance, think again. SDN deployments could potentially solve complex resource issues, especially in segments like healthcare and education.

Software-defined networking (SDN) is on the tip of everyone's tongue, and new initiatives seem to roll out daily from the networking vendors. The concept introduces strikingly different ideas for the networking discipline and is hailed by some as a huge innovation. But underneath the hype, there are practical use cases SDN is suited for and problems it could solve. Getting there, however, will take a little time.

Whenever I talk to someone about SDN, the word "revolutionary" inevitably comes up. The conversation sometimes begins sounding absurdly like the lyrics from the classic Beatles song:

You say you want a revolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world

Don't get me wrong. I believe that SDN is a disruptive technology that eventually will transform our current idea of networking. But, like the Fab Four, I'm not cheering for an imminent revolution.

Instead, I'm anticipating a long-term migration to SDN that will occur as organizations update their infrastructures and, more importantly, discover how it can help them practically manage network resources. At least that was my thinking before Cisco recently announced its Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI). With ACI, SDN seems more achievable in the near term. But for most businesses, the transition will be an evolution, rather than a revolution that takes place overnight.

As the technology is implemented, we will see computer networks that are more dynamic and easier to manage. That's because SDN allows you to abstract your underlying network architecture. You can turn a network -- or at least its SDN-ready components -- into a service for providing connectivity and compute resources on an as-needed basis. There is also evidence SDN will make load balancing, virtualization, and cloud deployments much simpler, and that high levels of utilization will be baked into the infrastructure. SDN will also provide much greater visibility into the network and associated servers, storage, and applications.

But realizing these benefits will take time because SDN is still a nascent technology. Some networking prognosticators are saying we need one to two years for practical products to be accepted by the market. And that sounds about right to me.

Having outlined those qualifiers, I don't think it's too early to start planning for how you can take advantage of SDN. There are some interesting ideas out there for using SDN to increase the flexibility and capabilities of infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS), virtual computing and storage, and datacenter load balancing.

Using SDN in the real world
To prepare, you need to start creating use cases to educate your team and change how they think about the network. A couple good examples of SDN scenarios come to mind.

The first involves the healthcare industry, which is under intense pressure to improve care and lower costs. Hospitals and other provider organizations are investing heavily in technology for applications such as big data, mobile diagnostics, electronic records, robotics, and telemedicine. All these strategies are compute, storage, and bandwidth intensive.

In today's world, IT managers for hospitals and other large institutions struggle to sustain performance during periods of peak usage. But with SDN, it is possible they could deploy fewer IT resources and still keep everybody happy. For example, you could program the network and your compute environment to shift resources to patient registration and hospital operating rooms in the morning when demand is typically high.

Later in the day, you could shift them to patient recovery and critical care, when those departments are busier and need more from the network. During the night, SDN could redistribute IT resources for bill processing, updating patient records, and other activities. Essentially, SDN is performing load balancing and virtual management on the fly so that resources are fully or better utilized.

The second use case focuses on the wired classroom. One of the big challenges for schools is providing adequate infrastructure to support technology-enabled education. With SDN, network administrators could gain flexibility for dynamically managing resources at the class and individual-student level.

Such capabilities provide opportunities for sharing resources across campuses based on the needs of students and educators. SDN also lets you grant security on a micro level for individual students or classrooms to permit access to specific resources, files, or websites during tests or sanctioned learning activities.

Industry providers are looking at these types of use cases and seeing significant opportunity for creating new revenue streams. There is currently a lot of discussion about what type of hardware and software will dominate in SDN. Cisco is betting that it has the answer with ACI. The company also has a solid list of application ISVs, and, in some cases, even competitors are partnering to develop on its open platform.

It is also possible we will see solutions based on proprietary networking software running on commodity hardware. But other network providers won't bow out of this market quietly. Regardless of the market leaders, SDN will have a dramatic impact on enterprise networking, not because it's the latest trend, but because it is, well, revolutionary.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
mmelvin201
50%
50%
mmelvin201,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/21/2013 | 1:54:59 PM
Re: ADN is already solving real world problems
Great comments and observations, thanks for contributing to the conversation.
gtennant
100%
0%
gtennant,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/19/2013 | 5:20:04 PM
ADN is already solving real world problems
Great article. 

The issue with the tradition hardware vendor driven SDN is that there are no standards and probably will not have standards for some time as different vendors have greatly varying interests in SDNs outcome.  Cisco is on the right path with ACI, but is obviously going its own way versus participating productively with SDN.

But the underlying premise of SDN is enabling a managed virtualized network infrastructure that can operate independently of vendor specific hardware.  SDN is also mainly focused on the data center where huge equipment investments are made.  This will evolve over time as you say, but it does not address how networks access the data center to take advantage of SDN in the first place.

Application Defined Networks (ADNs) are dedicated virtualized networks for the enterprise WAN and are in use and solving real world problems today.  ADN networks are in use or being adopted by many of the largest global enterprises such as Shell, Little Ceasers and Exxon Mobil.  ADN has been in operation for a couple of years and the largest vendors already have tens of thousands of sites deployed.

ADNs shift the traditional enterprise network from the limiting site-to-site model to an application-to-applications networking model.  This allows each app to be placed into its own unique virtual network and traverse an optimized path between the application enabler and the application gateway/data center.  ADNs connect securely to cloud services, corporate offices, data centers, and partner networks.  ADNs compartmentalize apps from one another, eliminating shared routing elements that are the source of security breach advancements.  In fact, ADN allows localized Internet access for Wi-Fi, mobile payment, and BYOD networks to be enabled in a compartmentalized manner from all other traffic.  That is a real world need.

While SDN evolves, ADN is thriving. 

 

 
mmelvin201
50%
50%
mmelvin201,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/19/2013 | 10:00:25 AM
Re: SDN adoption
Susan and Marcia,

There is a lot of potential complexity. Some will elect to engage a managed service offering, others will seek the support of professional services organizations to get them started and help them understand the fundamentals.  Others will develop their own in house staff and skills.

This will depend on a number of factors early on, time to market and speed to implement, the missoin of the organization and their appetite for the learning curve associated with the project(s).

As Marcia pointed out this is both a challenge and opportunity depending on the organization that you are working with.
MarciaNWC
50%
50%
MarciaNWC,
User Rank: Strategist
11/18/2013 | 2:12:53 PM
SDN adoption
These are interesting use case scenarios, but as Sue notes, SDN is a complex undertaking. For the networking profession, this poses both a challenge and an opportunity.
Susan Fogarty
50%
50%
Susan Fogarty,
User Rank: Strategist
11/18/2013 | 10:56:09 AM
Practical SDN
Mark, thanks for the great column. I agree that SDN offers a huge amount of potential. But it seems like such a complex undertaking, especially for companies that are looking at open standards. Do you think this will push companies to outsource their network and data center operations either to a vendor like Cisco or a partner that specializes in this area?
Cartoon
Hot Topics
5
VMware NSX Banks On Security
Marcia Savage, Managing Editor, Network Computing,  8/28/2014
4
Real-World SDN, Lesson 2: Conquer The Enemy Within
Symon Perriman, Senior Technical Evangelist, Microsoft,  8/25/2014
White Papers
Register for Network Computing Newsletters
Current Issue
2014 Private Cloud Survey
2014 Private Cloud Survey
Respondents are on a roll: 53% brought their private clouds from concept to production in less than one year, and 60% ­extend their clouds across multiple datacenters. But expertise is scarce, with 51% saying acquiring skilled employees is a roadblock.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed