Now that we've looked at some of the more popular applications of ISDN,
we will look at what types of equipment best implements these applications,
including NT1s, TAs, NICs, bridges and routers.
NT1s
ISDN abides by a set of standards that defines the layers of contact between
the central office and the users equipment. Each point of contact has a
specific function and communicates using a different layer of protocols
according to the needs of the users' equipment. The different points are
as follows: NT1, NT2, TE1 and TE2. About the only one that you need to worry
about in our scenario is the NT1. It represents the actual termination of
the ISDN circuit to the site and handles the communication to the telephone
switch for the devi
ces that it connects via TDM.
That is why a device accordingly called an Network Termination 1000 (NT1),
must reside between the switch interface (called the "U" interface)
and each ISDN-compatible equipment interface (called an "S" interface
for equipment such as TAs and/or a "T" interface for other switching
devices such as PBXes--often both are implemented into NT1 units, hence
the S/T label of the interface). Other devices that do not abide by the
ISDN standards, such as analog phones, can be accounted for by another interface
("R" interface) that is not usually implemented into simple NT1
units, but is commonly incorporated into SOHO-oriented ISDN devices or more
complex NT1 devices.
NT1 units typically connect ISDN-compatible devices to the ISDN line. More
complex NT1s connect non-compatible devices such as analog phones and fax
machines as well as ISDN-compatible devices.
NT1 units can be purchased as external devices or can be purchased as built-in
components to the ISDN equipment being connected. Every ISDN component needs
an NT1 to operate. There are advantages and disadvantages to having a built-in
NT1 unit. The built-in NT1s are usually a tad cheaper than external ones,
and the user doesn't have to deal with finding a place to put it. The simplest
external NT1s are usually about two-thirds the size of a standard modem,
and they cost around $100 to $150.
The disadvantages of internal NT1s is that you will have to leave the equipment
powered up to use the other devices connected to the NT1 device. This often
involves leaving your entire computer running, so it can power the TA card,
and the TA card can power its NT1, so your phone connected to the NT1 can
operate. This is often unacceptable to companies trying to conserve on electricity
bills and equipment wear. Most vendors offer their equipment with or without
NT1 units, so you will have a choice.
ISDN TAs and NICs
ISDN TAs work essentially the same as POTS modems. They look the same physically
as well as to the application using them for data transfer. Like POTS modems,
there are all types of TAs: internal, external and PC Cards (PCMCIA). It
doesn't matter which one you choose to implement as long as it fits your
needs.
You must consider one thing, however, when deciding to go with an external
TA, even though it isn't as much of a problem as it used to be. The user
equipment must have the serial chip set that can handle the higher speeds
of ISDN. Nothing less than a 16550 UART will do if you want full ISDN speeds
via external TAs. If possible, having an advanced serial card and driver
is ideal to eliminate any problems and take full advantage of the ISDN speeds.
However, most 486 and above PCs and 68040 and above Macs will handle the
serial speeds without any problems.
When choosing a modem, make sure that the modem supports 2B channel operation
and the vendor either supplies drivers that will allocate the B channels
or has support from your brand of operating system to allocate the channels
so that you can take advantage of ISDN's channel allocation features. Some
older modems won't even let you use the second B channel.
ISDN NICs carry many of the same attributes as TAs, but function as regular
LAN cards would on a 10BASE-T network. Similar to how a TA appears as just
another modem to the application, an ISDN NIC fools its application into
believing that it is talking to a regular NIC. The vendor usually provides
special NDIS or ODI drivers for the ISDN NIC that replace traditional ones
used for Ethernet. These drivers handle the ISDN functions of the card as
well as the translations from that network to the next layer of protocols
such as IPX and IP. ISDN NICs are essentially an interface to another network,
ISDN.
Which one is better? That naturally depends on your needs and implementation.
TAs can be made to perform the same functions through softw
are and can serve
many other simple roles such as plain terminal connections as well. NICs
are often but not always more transparent to the user when initiating and
terminating connections and can function as a NIC. TAs are typically more
popular than ISDN NICs.
ISDN Bridges
ISDN bridges do just that. They bridge data from one LAN to a remote LAN
transparently to the user just as though he or she were on the destination
LAN. Like TAs, ISDN bridges come in internal and external fashions and offer
built-in NT-1 unit options. They are essentially TAs or NICs with bridging
firmware that will transfer LAN traffic regardless of protocol between remote
sites. Bridges are a good choice for sites that run many protocols and operate
over relatively short distances. Bridges offer some packet filtering to
help reduce traffic, but do not filter out most of the packets generated
by routers and servers that could normally keep an expensive long distance
link up.
You must plan carefully before deciding to go with a bridged solution as
opposed to routing and choosing which product to use. Many bridges take
full advantage of standard ISDN channel allocation protocols and compression
algorithms to help manage the connection and minimize the usage of the ISDN
line, reducing the cost of operation. It is important to find out which
product supports the filtering and line management features that you need
for your network.
ISDN Routers
Among the more complex of the ISDN devices, routers allow remote sites to
take full advantage of an ISDN link and the traffic moving between the various
locations. Complex LAN configurations can be made simple and effective using
ISDN routers. Packets can be routed and filtered according to protocol and
packet type, and can be intelligently routed quickly to various sites using
either a single BRI connection, multiple BRIs or PRI connections.
The router vendors have been hard pressed over the past t
wo or so years
to abide by standards for remote access and LAN-to-LAN routing connections
and link management. Standards such as Multilink PPP and Stac compression
are among the most popular issues among router solutions. These standards
define common protocols for ISDN devices to establish an ISDN link, route
specific protocols, allocate bandwidth on demand and compress data between
different vendors equipment. ISDN interoperability among various vendors
has proven to be a nightmare in the past. This is important when scalability
is a factor in choosing a routing solutions or when third parties are to
be integrated into your network solution such as ISPs.
Many of the routers can link remote dial-in users as well as linking LANs
to LANs. Many also offer bridging capability for the protocols that they
don't route. There are standards for each. As a result of the standards
effort, many ISDN routers now offer the most cost-effective solution to
linking branch offices that need the bandwidth and low cost. Beware: Many
still use proprietary solutions and still don't do the trick. Good ISDN
routers will tend to cost more than any of the other ISDN devices mentioned
in this text, but will soon pay for themselves in cost of operation when
linking central LANs and remote LANs.
Aside from single BRI routers, higher-end solutions are available that work
with these lower-end BRI routers. Some vendors offer routers with multiple
BRI interfaces with the option to add more as you scale. If you are already
planning to start big, weigh the cost of multiple BRI connections against
a PRI and related equipment. Large companies with many remote users and
ISPs typically use PRI circuits and routers to best manage many users dialing
in from many destinations. PRI is very expensive, but ideal in these situations.
For the rest of us, BRI can be scaleable and cost effective if planned right.
REPORTS
Analyize In-Line NAC strategies and products.
ANALYTICS Plan and design your enterprise blade server deployments
InformationWeek U.S. IT Salary Survey 2008
Salaries for business technology professionals are falling. Here's what you need to know in order to make good hiring decisions and personal career choices. Purchase Today: $299