Using Fixed Wireless Broadband Technology
Until about 1996, the only economical way to connect LANs was
through a wired infrastructure. In the last 5 years, several new wireless
broadband LAN infrastructures have been proposed and built. Wireless local loop
is a new wireless broadband option and comes under fixed wireless broadband as
opposed to mobile. Fixed
here refers to a fixed location. It means that the data transmission is
wireless and that the stations are fixed, unlike in mobile, where the stations
could be moving (assuming that a station is a subscriber). Here, the stations
communicate at a very high speed. Dense modulation schemes are also required,
and a higher signal-to-noise ratio is required in the fixed wireless broadband
scheme.
Advantages of Using Fixed Wireless Broadband Technology for LANs
Some of the various advantages of adopting a fixed wireless
broadband paradigm are:
- The entry and setup costs are very small
(setup cost is very low, and expansion can always be opted on demand).
- Systems can be set up with great ease and
speed. All equipment can be carried and installed with great ease.
- Equipment can be set up only after a customer signs up. This
is different from wired systems, because for wired LANs, a complete
infrastructure has to be built even before the customers show up.
- The buildout becomes demand-based,
which is a major advantage when compared with wired architectures.
- The cost of upgrading can be substantially less, since there
is no other infrastructure other than the end equipment. Once the equipment is
designed to be upgradable, upgrading becomes very easy.
- There is less overhead for changing the transmission
equipment, and many problems of wired LANs, such as damage tracking in
transmission equipment, do not exist at all.
- Once the basic infrastructure is handled, quality of service
can be achieved.
- Bandwidth reuse is very high because of the cell structure
used.
- Network management, maintenance, and
operating costs can be very low. However, it is believed to be low at this
time, but as the number of users grow, network management and operating costs
will increase. Nevertheless, there is no real evidence that in the long run it
will be less expensive to manage the networks (software and personnel costs).
Maintenance, on the other hand, is definitely lower because there is less
physical plant.2
Thus the recent wireless broadband networks have the ability to
offer a wide range of one-way and two-way voice, data, and video service
transmission capabilities with a capacity many times larger than any current
wireless or nonwireless service.
Different Methods Available for Fixed Wireless Broadband
Communications
In order to achieve fixed wireless broadband communications, various
physical media and equipment can be used—ranging from infrared, to
microwave, to radiowave. A major problem with using an infrared signal is that
it can be obstructed by physical objects. It is also likely that it can be
affected by extreme weather conditions such as heat. Thus there should be an
unobstructed path between the communicating equipment, which is not always
possible. Microwave systems operate at less than 500 mW of power. For fixed
service, broadband wireless access systems are of particular interest. The
reasons for this are that they are very quick to install and are economical and
cost-effective. Moreover, interconnection of the base station to fixed public
switched telephone network (PSTN) is also possible and easy. In using the
wireless broadband signal, there are various issues that need to be discussed,
one important one being the spectrum that can be used.
Spectrum Allocation and Partitioning
The primary issue that needs attention is the spectrum in broadband
that is best suited for fixed wireless needs and the bandwidth required for
achieving a high data transmission rate. The FCC made several new bands of
wireless spectrum available. In order to create viable opportunities for
wireless broadband competition to incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs)
(they built a wired high-speed infrastructure for data transmission), the FCC
enhanced the capacity of the existing spectrum licenses. It started a host of
omnidirectional wireless high-speed-access (HSA) networks. The new allocations
promote bidirectional transport with no receive-site license required.
Now let's discuss the new omnidirectional transmission bands.
There are many bands other than the ones just discussed but none with exclusive
licensing structure and bandwidth.
Integration with Existing Technology
The FCC has started a host of different omnidirectional high-speed
access broadband networks that can be integrated with existing wireless
broadband technology. They are:
- The 38-GHz band
- The 28-GHz or LMDS band
- The DEMS band
- The MMDS band
The 38-GHz Band
The 38-GHz band is licensed primarily
to WinStar. Winstar uses asynchronous transfer mode (ATM)-based equipment and
provides plain old telephone service (POTS) and high-speed data. From a cost
point of view (starting with point-to-point links and then as the network size
increases), switching to an omnidirectional cell site is advisable. However,
for a particular network, the shifting overhead is more, so it is better to
start with omnidirectional networks.
The 28-GHz or LMDS Band
The 28-GHz band was regulated in 1998, with only a few major companies
participating (see sidebar, "Propagation Impairment"). This is
called the LMDS band because LMDS operates in this band in the United States.
Note: It could be different for different countries; for
example, in Europe, it is the 40-GHz band.
The 28-GHz band has different blocks of bandwidth: the A block with
1150 MHz of bandwidth and the B block with 150 of MHz bandwidth. A high degree
of cellularization is required with this band. Cell size is about 2 miles in
radius. Various new proposals have been made about the band, and some of these
will be discussed later in this chapter.
The DEMS Band
The DEMS band was allocated originally at 18 GHz. It has 100 MHz of bandwidth.
The MMDS Band
The FCC allocated about 200 MHz of spectrum at 2.1 and 2.5 to 2.7 GHz for
television transmission. In 1995 and 1998, the FCC allowed for digital
transmission with CDMA (code division multiple access), QPSK (phase shift
keying), VSB (vestigial side band), and QAM (quadrature amplitude modulation)
modulation schemes. This band is licensed primarily to such companies as
SpeedChoice and Wavepath.