Comments
The New Storage Bottlenecks
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Tom Isakovich
50%
50%
Tom Isakovich,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/12/2012 | 8:09:25 PM
re: The New Storage Bottlenecks
Hi George,

Thank you for raising this critical topic. Most disk arrays are 6 to 1 "oversubscribed", relying on "expanders" to split a limited amount of bandwidth into 24 or more drive slots. This oversubscription is commonplace in the industry since even 15K rpm hard drives cannot push the IOps limit of this approach. But with flash memory, everything changes. In fact, just 2-3 flash drives or SSDs can overwhelm such expander-based approaches.

This is why a non-blocking architecture (one without oversubscription) is essential. Surprisingly, virtually all new "purpose-built SSD boxes" use the same old JBOD enclosures designed for disk arrays, just populated this time with SSDs. Such systems are no different and no better than just slotting SSDs into existing disk arrays.

In short, customers should ask their vendor to identify the data path in their systems end-to-end to make sure there in no oversubscription.

Tom Isakovich
tom@nimbusdata.com


White Papers
Register for Network Computing Newsletters
Cartoon
Current Issue
2014 State of Unified Communications
2014 State of Unified Communications
If you thought consumerization killed UC, think again: 70% of our 488 respondents have or plan to put systems in place. Of those, 34% will roll UC out to 76% or more of their user base. And there’s some good news for UCaaS providers.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed