Comments
Cisco To Buy Orchestration Software Startup Tail-f
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
jgherbert
50%
50%
jgherbert,
User Rank: Ninja
6/28/2014 | 10:35:25 PM
Re: PacketU observations
"I feel Cisco would lose market value if they revert on their commitment to openness."

<cynic>As might the competition's market value if they rely on ConfD for their own product delivery too.</cynic>

You could argue that this isn't really all about ConfD in any case. As I muttered over on my own blog:

"AT&T has been pushing its Domain 2.0 initiative, and recently named Tail-F as one of its Domain 2.0 suppliers, which is a huge deal for Tail-F. And now it's a huge deal for Cisco too, who by this acquisition are back in the door with AT&T (they aren't one of the other five named companies)."


This is a big deal for Cisco, who just got cut out the loop with AT&T because AT&T apparently sees x86 NFV as the way forward.
Brian.Dean
50%
50%
Brian.Dean,
User Rank: Ninja
6/20/2014 | 10:24:40 AM
Re: PacketU observations
Since, estimates predict that the number of connections are going to increase (some put it at 50 billion by 2020), the Cloud is going to house more data, and enterprise is going to require greater network resources, because of video collaboration, etc. I feel Cisco would lose market value if they revert on their commitment to openness.  
Brian.Dean
50%
50%
Brian.Dean,
User Rank: Ninja
6/20/2014 | 10:11:55 AM
Re: PacketU observations
@Rubyliu, good assessment, I am wondering, what are the business practices/models (open-source vs. proprietary?) that could cause friction in ConfD adaption along with NETCONF and YANG, and not to occur in a harmonious fashion?
MarciaNWC
50%
50%
MarciaNWC,
User Rank: Strategist
6/18/2014 | 3:58:37 PM
NETCONF
If you're interested in learning more about NETCONF, stay tuned. We'll be publishing an article that explains what it does and how it works soon.
MarciaNWC
50%
50%
MarciaNWC,
User Rank: Strategist
6/18/2014 | 11:59:08 AM
Re: PacketU observations
Cisco says this deal illustrates its commitment to openness and multi-vendor environments, but time will tell. Perhaps things have changed for Cisco.
rubyliu
50%
50%
rubyliu,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/18/2014 | 5:49:47 AM
Re: PacketU observations
While NCS is the jewel Cisco will want out of this acquisition it will be interesting to see how they maintain the ConfD business that has helped NetConf and Yang become a reality and, I assume, still make up the vast majority of Tail-f's customer base. I can't imagine the equipment vendors using ConfD will be comfortable with the new owners.

For Cisco, a software product like ConfD is a new beast and will require very different business practices to remain successful. Cisco has made steps in supporting multivendor networks with Cariden and other products but this takes it to another level. It will be interesting to see if the rest of the market players are ready for it or if it stalls the adoption of NetConf and Yang.

Answers by http://www.fiberstore.com
MarciaNWC
50%
50%
MarciaNWC,
User Rank: Strategist
6/17/2014 | 7:39:11 PM
PacketU observations
Paul Stewart posted a blog on Packet University with some thoughts on what the acquisition of Tail-f may mean for Cisco. What do readers think about the deal?


Cartoon
Slideshows
Audio Interviews
Archived Audio Interviews
Jeremy Schulman, founder of Schprockits, a network automation startup operating in stealth mode, joins us to explore whether networking professionals all need to learn programming in order to remain employed.
White Papers
Register for Network Computing Newsletters
Current Issue
2014 State of Unified Communications
2014 State of Unified Communications
If you thought consumerization killed UC, think again: 70% of our 488 respondents have or plan to put systems in place. Of those, 34% will roll UC out to 76% or more of their user base. And there’s some good news for UCaaS providers.
Video
Twitter Feed