Christine Taylor

Network Computing Blogger


Upcoming Events

Cloud Connect
Santa Clara
Feb 13-16, 2012

Cloud Connect brings together the entire cloud eco-system to better understand the transformation we're experiencing and promises to be the defining event of the cloud computing industry. Learn about the latest cloud technologies and platforms from thought leaders in Cloud Connect’s comprehensive conference.

Register Now!

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up

ECA: A Big Trend For An Old Topic

Early case assessment (ECA) is moving farther and farther to the left of the EDRM. Given the "early" part, it seems like ECA should already have been closer to the left-hand side. But no; it was traditionally the first pass of the review stage because attorneys lacked the tools to effectively accomplish it any earlier than that. I think of ECA primarily in terms of initial review analysis, but it could also include early interviews with data custodians. Manual ECA requires that the data be loaded into the review system already. At this point the reviewers can get to work with a first pass analysis and a full review yet to come.

The problem rose with tighter eDiscovery timelines and the need to be better informed at meet-and-confer time. Attorneys that were waiting on manual ECA were waiting themselves right out of a case-winning strategy (or smart case settlement anyway). By moving ECA to its proper place early in the workflow, the process is better positioned in planning and strategy.

eDiscovery vendors with analytics capabilities have been quick to jump on the bandwagon. First in were vendors who already provided software analytics around early collected data sets. They generally lacked full review capabilities at the time, but positioned themselves as ECA providers at an early stage in the eDiscovery workflow. The move proved popular with customers who were struggling to do first pass review earlier in the cycle. The technology also offered a way to do ECA much more cheaply because it did not require as much manual review. The software was able to form threads, comparisons, relationships and statistics much faster than human reviewers could.

The next wave of vendors into true ECA made full review packages. These vendors already provided first-pass review support but not the highly automated nature of the new ECA offerings. Most of these vendors have now announced new ECA capabilities, and the ones who haven't will shortly.

Among the first companies to offer ECA as a distinct process are Clearwell and Kazeon. Clearwell's initial offering was firmly based on ECA, and it has since expanded its abilities to include review. Kazeon began life as a search and indexing vendor but parlayed its analytics into an ECA package early on. Some newer ECA announcements have come from RenewData (newly acquired Vestigate; it already offered ECA for ActiveVault,) CaseCentral ECA as part of its review and production workflow, and Level 9's earlyCASE for PC-level ECA. I'll also mention Anacomp's combined service offering for ECA, which includes consulting, methodology and software.


Page:  1 | 2 |Next Page »

Related Reading


More e-discovery Insights



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

Research and Reports

Hypervisor Derby
August 2011

Network Computing: August 2011

TechWeb Careers