George Crump


Upcoming Events

Cloud Connect
Santa Clara
Feb 13-16, 2012

Cloud Connect brings together the entire cloud eco-system to better understand the transformation we're experiencing and promises to be the defining event of the cloud computing industry. Learn about the latest cloud technologies and platforms from thought leaders in Cloud Connect’s comprehensive conference.

Register Now!

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up

Live From SNW - Day 1

Our semi-annual storage pilgrimage lands in Phoenix this year. Nice change of venue for Storage Networking World (SNW). As we did with SNW in the spring and VMworld last month, I will be doing updates throughout the three days. As always I ask your patience as we are doing this rapid fire.
Our next briefing was with the SNIA group driving the Cloud Storage Initiative. They are trying to round up the herd of cats and bring some organization to the term. No small task. This is important for SNIA because clearly cloud storage is driving new technologies and is bringing new companies to the storage fold that normally have not been part of the community. 
The big change of course in cloud storage is not so much the technology as it is the way that storage is delivered via an on-demand model. It is also a shift in administration. As one of the SNIA representatives put it, the disk drive has been commoditized but not the administration of that disk drive. The cloud seeks to commoditize that storage administration as well. 
Part of the work of this SNIA committee is to develop a common cloud API set that applications can interface with. I believe that APIs are going to be an important part of cloud adoption going forward and attempts at a standard deserve consideration. It will be interesting to see how the rest of the community responds to the effort.
Next up on Monday's briefings was Sepaton. Sepaton continues its focus on providing disk based data protection for large enterprises. Sepaton's target customers tend to start at 50TB and up. To address this market they have a clustered or grid based architecture that scales to meet the performance and capacity requirements of these enterprises. They recently announced delta based replication to go along with their deduplication technology. Our discussion focused more on what was coming next.
Sepaton plans on leveraging its content aware architecture to scale beyond basic data protection capabilities to be able to provide data management to additional non-primary storage data repositories. Since Sepaton understands the data that it is currently backing up, it is not a far leap for them to be able to do something with that data. That could be tasks like indexing, retention or even migration to different tiers for secondary storage.
These capabilities are critical when you consider the landscape in which Sepaton competes. Enterprise players are still trying to figure out their right ingredient for high end disk based backup and I think are discovering that it has to do more than just copy data from disk to disk. You have to do something with that data when you get it.
HP was next up on the briefing calendar. While they are not announcing anything major at the show, I had time to sit down with them and discuss their storage strategy which was valuable for me because I have been confused in the past. My interpretation is that HP Storage now is broken down into two broad groups: platforms and unified storage. The platform group is the classic traditional storage platform. 
The unified storage group is made up of products from a series of HP acquisitions like Lefthand Networks, Ibrix, and Polyserve as well as internal products like their disk to disk and VTL solutions. The key here is that the products in the unified group are typically built on an X86 infrastructure. They are delivering these services either on classic servers like the ProLiant, their blades, virtual machines or an integrated storage platform. 
HP is in an interesting position. With their c-Class BladeSystem as a starting point, HP could provide a rack where storage applications, virtualization solutions and applications are provisioned on an as-needed basis, almost like a cloud in a rack.
AutoVirt - First up was AutoVirt. They have created a software based global name space focused solely on the Windows platform. 85% of unstructured data is on the Windows platform, especially in AutoVirt's target market; mid-market data centers. The product provides storage managers the ability to quickly and easily create a global name space. With the name space in place, storage managers can move folders and files between the different Window shares transparently to the users. 
AutoVirt is announcing their 3.0 release at the show. In addition to migration and file movement, it adds the ability to replicate and provide file level archive. Replication brings a certain HA flavor to Windows based file servers. With the name space in place, if one server is not available the user is re-routed to a backup server. The archive function allows the movement of data to a specific archive tier and then sets that data to read only, providing a base level of compliance. 
The market that AutoVirt is focused, mid-tier data centers, is in pain when it comes to data management. They are at the point where they can't keep buying more storage and ignore the problem and there is too much of it to move to a different storage tier via manual brute force.

Related Reading


More data-protection Insights



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 

DataProtection Reports

Research and Reports

Hypervisor Derby
August 2011

Network Computing: August 2011

TechWeb Careers