Cloud Infrastructure

03:30 PM
Boris Renski
Boris Renski
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

VMware Vs. KVM: OpenStack Hypervisor Race Heats Up

KVM, the default hypervisor in OpenStack cloud software, faces increasing competition from VMware ESX Server. Mirantis cofounder Boris Renski puts the race in context.

Editor's note: Mirantis' cofounder and EVP Boris Renski said on September 11, 2012, that the OpenStack Foundation's accepting VMware was a mistake. Now he finds himself eating some of those words.

So far, open-source KVM has been enjoying uncontested leadership as the default hypervisor for OpenStack cloud software. That's largely because OpenStack runs on Linux and KVM comes standard with all Linux distributions. A recent survey of 822 OpenStack users by the OpenStack User Committee clearly illustrates KVM's predominance. KVM's share is represented by 86 users, versus 6 ESX users on server clusters with one to one hundred cores. On larger clusters of 101 to 500 cores, the gap remains large: 33 KVM to 4 ESX.

However, we are starting to see trends that indicate that KVM is being challenged by ESX Server. About 18 months ago in my presentation at the OpenStack Summit, I shared my vision of the OpenStack adoption curve over time. The year 2014 would be when enterprises start seriously looking at OpenStack. Today it seems like my prediction was correct. Looking at Mirantis' customers and pipeline, we see a significant spike in uptake of OpenStack by traditional enterprises, particularly those in financial services.

When it comes to the enterprise market, we all know that VMware's vSphere virtualization management system is king. While we can argue day and night whether the OpenStack/ESX Server combination makes sense, one thing is for sure: enterprises will not do away with their existing VMware investment overnight. This means that as OpenStack gains its enterprise footprint, it will be increasingly used to offer self-service capabilities on top of vSphere infrastructure, which in turn will bump up ESX's share among hypervisors being used with OpenStack.

[Appliances that link on-premises systems to cloud resources are shrinking the traditional datacenter. Read The Thinning Of The Datacenter.]

VMware is a threat to partner service providers
This year VMware made its long-awaited hybrid cloud service announcement. Good news for VMware. Bad news for cloud service providers that built their business on VMware technology. Now they have to compete with the vendor whose technology they've been reselling for years. VMware service providers now have to hedge, and OpenStack is the answer.

Again, throwing away VMware and retooling the entire stack is not the answer. Running OpenStack on top of vSphere translates into more customer choice and hedging against VMware over time. The result: more OpenStack with ESX.

RIP vCloud Director
VMware also announced the split of vCloud Director into vCloud Automation Center (vCAC), a product that's derived from VMware's DynamicOps acquisition. This left a gap in VMware's product portfolio around DevOps-focused, self-service functionality. vCAC is heavyweight software, much like an IT service management product, requiring deep integration with IT business processes and an ERP-like implementation scenario. Pure vCenter, on the other hand, is built for system admins and lacks the cloud-like self-service features that WS has established as a standard for the next-generation engineering ecosystem.

Moreover, enterprises today are concerned about vendor lock-in. As they consider moving beyond virtualization toward a private cloud, they can choose to either invest more in VMware, or proceed on a tactically challenging but strategically rewarding path of open -- as in open-source and OpenStack.

Running OpenStack on top of vSphere is a sensible choice that can edge enterprises closer to the cloud. On the one hand, they get the self-service functionality of discontinued vCloud Director. On the other, they take a step toward liberating their stack from vendor lock-in.


VMware is committed to OpenStack
Last but not least, despite my earlier speculations, VMware actually did make a very tangible commitment to ensure that OpenStack runs well with VMware products -- a sensible move if the company wants to stay relevant in the datacenter.

The company is aggressively hiring to augment its OpenStack organization and has been consistently on the list of top 10 code contributors to the open project.

VMware has also partnered with some prominent OpenStack players, such as Mirantis and Canonical, to ensure that its customers will succeed with OpenStack/VMware implementations.

While all these factors are unlikely to dethrone KVM from the number one spot, they will make meaningful headway in favor of ESX in 2014.

I believe this is a positive trend. After all, there are two camps of thought on OpenStack. The first believes OpenStack is a bunch of raw open-source code bits meant for commercial vendors to reuse in an opinionated, integrated solution. The second believes it is an open, standards-based fabric for federating diverse pools of infrastructure. The first camp equates OpenStack to just another messy open-source project, the second to a highly disruptive, industry-changing phenomenon. At Mirantis we put our money on the second view. A healthier diversity at the OpenStack hypervisor layer will edge OpenStack closer to that vision.

Emerging standards for hybrid clouds and converged datacenters promise to break vendors' proprietary hold. Also in the Lose The Lock-In issue of InformationWeek: The future datacenter will come in a neat package. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Li Tan
50%
50%
Li Tan,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/22/2013 | 9:36:10 PM
Re: VMware realized threat posed by KVM
Exactly - these are actually two different business models. VMWare uses a kind of more traditional software business modle while KVM's pricing is more service/support oriented. We cannot simply say which one is better - it depends on the different needs from customer. 
samicksha
50%
50%
samicksha,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/19/2013 | 4:45:53 AM
Re: VMware realized threat posed by KVM
You are right Li, VMWare was the only player in room, apart from this when i look towards VMware and KVM both offer similar functionality, I guess the cost is game changer here because VMware's pricing is built upon license, service and support fees while KVM's pricing is largely based on service and support.
Li Tan
50%
50%
Li Tan,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/19/2013 | 4:03:46 AM
Re: VMware realized threat posed by KVM
The enterprise will not simply abandon the investment on VMWare/ESX. But KVM is indeed something to be worried about by VMWare. To embrace OpenStack, VMWare needs some adroid and agile move from both strategic and execution level. Hyper-V may not be a big piece of cake but VMWare needs to be cautious about KVM.
cbabcock
50%
50%
cbabcock,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/18/2013 | 8:00:29 PM
VMware realized threat posed by KVM
At the end of August in 2011, I tried to explain why VMware should worry more about KVM than Hyper-V. http://www.informationweek.com/mobile/vmware-should-worry-more-about-red-hat/d/d-id/1099936?itc=edit_in_body_cross  Now Boris is explaining how VMware did worry about KVM and describes some of the adroit moves its made to hold its own with the development of OpenStack. Boris is pretty adroit also -- as a reformed VMware critic.  
Hot Topics
13
Fall IT Events: On The Road Again With 10 Top Picks
James M. Connolly, Editor in Chief, The Enterprise Cloud Site,  7/29/2014
5
25 GbE: A Big Deal That Will Arrive
Greg Ferro, Network Architect & Blogger,  7/29/2014
3
Cisco Ships APIC Controller, Reveals ACI Pricing
Marcia Savage, Managing Editor, Network Computing,  7/29/2014
White Papers
Register for Network Computing Newsletters
Cartoon
Current Issue
2014 Private Cloud Survey
2014 Private Cloud Survey
Respondents are on a roll: 53% brought their private clouds from concept to production in less than one year, and 60% ­extend their clouds across multiple datacenters. But expertise is scarce, with 51% saying acquiring skilled employees is a roadblock.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed