George Crump

Upcoming Events

Where the Cloud Touches Down: Simplifying Data Center Infrastructure Management

Thursday, July 25, 2013
10:00 AM PT/1:00 PM ET

In most data centers, DCIM rests on a shaky foundation of manual record keeping and scattered documentation. OpManager replaces data center documentation with a single repository for data, QRCodes for asset tracking, accurate 3D mapping of asset locations, and a configuration management database (CMDB). In this webcast, sponsored by ManageEngine, you will see how a real-world datacenter mapping stored in racktables gets imported into OpManager, which then provides a 3D visualization of where assets actually are. You'll also see how the QR Code generator helps you make the link between real assets and the monitoring world, and how the layered CMDB provides a single point of view for all your configuration data.

Register Now!

A Network Computing Webinar:
SDN First Steps

Thursday, August 8, 2013
11:00 AM PT / 2:00 PM ET

This webinar will help attendees understand the overall concept of SDN and its benefits, describe the different conceptual approaches to SDN, and examine the various technologies, both proprietary and open source, that are emerging. It will also help users decide whether SDN makes sense in their environment, and outline the first steps IT can take for testing SDN technologies.

Register Now!

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up

See more from this blogger

The First Mover Disadvantage

There is always an advantage to being first to market with a new product or technology, except in storage and networking. Companies that are first in the space have the most difficult time staying viable. Certainly there are exceptions, but it seems that there is a first mover disadvantage in this area of technology.

The first mover almost always has to explain what this new wrinkle in storage is, how it works and why you might want it. I'll never forget the first deduplication company years ago that I met with, and how they tried to explain how deduplication worked. Basically, I got the impression that they were saying, "we are going to save you money but not store all your backup data," and that did not seem like a good idea to me. The second company that came through had the advantage of refining the message a little bit and building on the groundwork that the early mover laid.

Another luxury the second movers have is time. Time for the market to evolve and time for customers to absorb what this new technology can do. People rarely get it the first time. Repetition after all is the mother of perfection. Time is needed for the problem that the new company is solving to really become a problem. A great example is file virtualization or global file systems. We have seen a few of the early movers in the space disappear and others evolve or get purchased. In some cases, these companies may have acted before the extend of the need was clear; the problem appeared like a bruise not a broken bone. Now, unstructured data is a massive problem in many data centers, and they are actively looking to companies like F5 and AutoVirt to help address it.

The masters of the second mover advantage are the larger, more established companies that wait for the market to develop and for the various competitors to work themselves out before deciding which one to acquire. While it probably costs them more to wait until a leader shows itself, the extra money spent is well worth picking a more viable entrance to the market. Many end-users simply won't buy a new technology until it is purchased, not even OEM'ed, through a larger storage manufacturer. They know how to play the waiting game too.

There are exceptions to every rule. There are first movers who are successful or at least viable right out of the gate. These are addressing a problem that you are having right now or who fill a gap left by other manufacturers. Automated tiering solutions, like those from Avere, Storspeed and Dataram, are good examples. There is a gap between SSD and mechanical drives, and these companies are looking to fill it. Interestingly, an indicator of success for a market is how many of these companies enter at nearly the same time, thus avoiding being the lone pioneer getting all the arrows. Multiple organizations telling the importance of a technology increases the chances for success.

George Crump is lead analyst of Storage Switzerland, an IT analyst firm focused on the storage and virtualization segments. Storage Switzerland's disclosure statement.

Related Reading

More Insights

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | Please read our commenting policy.
Vendor Comparisons
Network Computing’s Vendor Comparisons provide extensive details on products and services, including downloadable feature matrices. Our categories include:

Research and Reports

Network Computing: April 2013

TechWeb Careers