
The Appeal of Thin
Thin clients address all these issues, but at the expense of flexibility. What's more, they provoke resistance by bucking the status quo. But just as the so-called PC revolution turned out to be more of an evolution, as evidenced by all those corporate mainframe dinosaurs humming right along as we approach the millennium, the Java-based thin client that has been so lavishly hyped for the past couple of years cannot be a sudden success. Why? We're still waiting for some necessary applications.
 The ultimate success of Java-based thin clients relies on the appearance of reasonable alternatives to today's visually appealing and functionally efficient GUI-based Windows applications. Unfortunately, organizations that have been frantically planning and implementing client/server systems during the past few years generally have not had the option of deploying thin-client applications. If--or, more likely, when--such applications appear, whether they're based on Java, dynamic HTML or an alternative that hasn't been invented yet, they will make the selection of standards-oriented thin-client hardware a viable option. In the meantime, it should come as no surprise that today's hottest thin-client technology--WBT--is the one that specializes in delivering the fat clients predominant in today's software market.
Thin-client computing has an obvious appeal. Thin clients let IT managers leverage their investment in building reliable standards-based network infrastructures. They can deliver a software environment that approaches the four-9's--that is, the 99.99 percent reliability of the public phone system--and they can do so for less money. And while much has been made of the falling prices of desktop hardware, real savings are achieved by reducing IT staff overhead.
Thin clients offer better security, improved reliability, more flexible deployment and upgrades, and, most important, less opportunity for users to tinker with their computers. All the TCO (total cost of ownership) models are in agreement here. But are you willing to inflict such change on users who love their PCs? Maybe you should be, but not so fast.
|