Upcoming Events

Executive conference

Cloud Connect March 16-18

Comprehensive thought leadership for executives, IT professionals and developers. Topics include: the ROI, cost and economics of on-demand computing; Migration strategies to move from on-premise to cloud-based IT; Vertical cloud specialization, tailoring features and architectures to specific applications, industries, and customer ecosystems

More Events »

Subscribe to Newsletter

  • Keep up with all of the latest news and analysis on the fast-moving IT industry with Network Computing newsletters.
Sign Up




State of the NOS

Hewlett-Packard Co.'s HP-UX
Solaris is not the only enterprise Unix game in town. HP's HP-UX 11.0, released in the last quarter of 1997, brings performance and feature enhancements over HP-UX 10.2. In addition, HP also released its biggest and baddest server, the HP V Class, which is one of the top performers in TPC-C results for nonclustered systems. HP also offers complete enterprise solutions that support mission-critical applications. While corporations will have to shell out dollars for the additional support, it is a cost of doing business that many companies easily justify, especially with HP's new 99.9 percent uptime guarantee.

Among the advantages HP-UX 11.0 offers are a full 64-bit OS, the implementation of kernel threads, support for large di sk arrays and the ability to optimize memory page sizes. All of these features make 11.0 an attractive application hosting platform. In addition, the top two performing HP systems in the TPC-C benchmarks were based on HP-UX 11.0.

HP was not the first to market with a 64-bit Unix offering; Digital has had one since 1994. Because HP wanted to provide backward compatibility, both 32- and 64-bit applications can run on the same HP-UX 11.0 system and communicate with each other using RPCs (Remote Procedure Calls). Besides addressing more memory and large disk capabilities, 64 bits allow for greater computing precision, making it ideal for high-end scientific or mathematical applications. Sun also has a 64-bit offering but it's not 64 bits throughout--the file system is 64 bit, but the Solaris kernel is still 32 bit. Currently, HP systems can address 16 GB of physical memory, while Solaris addresses 30 GB and NT addresses only 4 GB.

Should you upgrade to HP-UX 11.0? Many ISVs will not recompile their existin g 32-bit applications to 64 bit, with the exception of higher-end database-application vendors. Thus, if your application does not take advantage of 64-bit computing, you're better off staying with 10.2 for now. On the other hand, if your application would benefit greatly from some of the additional new features in 11.0 such as IPSec, IPv6 or POPS (Performance Optimization Page Size), you might want to make the jump.

Some of the technology found in HP-UX is not developed by HP. NIS (Network Information Service) and NFS are licensed from Sun. NIS and NIS+ offer a directory service function for Unix platforms. HP-UX 11.0's NFS version 3 is usable only over UDP (User Datagram Protocol). According to HP, NFS 3 over TCP will be available in the first half of this year. In addition, a 64-bit version of Veritas' Journaled File System (JFS) is available that offers extremely fast performance and greater reliability.

Jay Milne can be reached at jmilne@nwc.com.

Hits And Misses

Windows NT 5.0 Hits
·Includes a slew of applications that make it a one-stop platform
· Continues to benefit from strong ISV support
· Features enhanced remote management facilities

Misses
·Needs three MMC snap-ins to manage ADS effectively
· Possible lack of ISV support for ADS following release of NT 5.0
· Estimated shipping date at least nine to 12 months away

NetWare 5 Hits
·Enhanced file system, NSS, provides faster mounting times and greater fault tolerance
·Integration of SMP and the addition of virtual memory and a preemptive multitasking kernel make it a better platform to run applications
· NDS available on non-NetWare platforms

Misses
·Needs additional new code for ap plications to take advantage of virtual memory
· Integrated HA/clustering technology (code-named Orion) still not available
· Gamble on Java Virtual Machine as primary application development environment is risky

Unix Hits
· Strong heritage of enterprise client/server applications
· TCP/IP and other standards "born" on Unix systems
·"Been there, done that" with high-availability and clustering solutions

Misses
· Often requires more specialized expertise (and cost) to manage effectively
· Has not effectively provided solutions for LAN and departmental networks


Best of the Web

Data deduplication: Declawing the clones

Data deduplication is emerging as a critically important new arrow in the storage administrator's quiver to answer hard questions about the increasing problem in storage growth costs.

Quick Read

Compression, Encryption, Deduplication, and Replication: Strange Bedfellows

One of the great ironies of storage technology is the inverse relationship between efficiency and security: Adding performance or reducing storage requirements almost always results in reducing the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of a system.

Quick Read

WAN Optimization Whitelists and Blacklists

Optimization is a fantastic way of saving money and creating really happy customers at the same time, but it doesn't work flawlessly for all applications.

Quick Read

WAN Optimization as a Managed Service: It's Not About the Cost

This insight examines how organizations outsourcing their WAN optimization initiatives to a third-party go about achieving their goals for application performance, reducing operational costs, and streamlining enterprise infrastructure.

Quick Read

  Sponsored Links

Premium Content

Data Centers Gone Wild
February 22, 2010

NWC


Salary

Video